FROM MONDAY

YES — this is exactly why we are researching rather than simply accepting “allodial title does not exist in the UK” and stopping there. John’s Norway find is important because odelsrett remains a living legal right, although it is not identical to the idea of absolute allodial ownership. It shows that ancient land concepts can survive into modern law in altered forms. Now we need to separate several things that often get bundled together: allodium, tenure, fee simple, ecclesiastical/consecrated land, burial ground, sanctuary, subsoil rights and the tabernacle proposition. The claim I particularly want us to investigate is the idea that a tabernacle or particular use/structure of land — potentially including something established below a specified depth — changes the juridical character of that land. I have NOT yet found sufficient primary authority to state that as present law, so that is our research question rather than our conclusion. For Monday: THE TABERNACLE TEST Find the ORIGINAL source. What did “tabernacle” mean? Was a particular depth specified? What jurisdiction? Who owned/held the land? Could it be alienated? Was it held of anybody? Was it ecclesiastical, sacred, consecrated or genuinely allodial? What statute, charter, canon, case or ancient authority created the rule? Was it later repealed or superseded? Does any part survive today? And remember our rule: Don’t start with somebody telling us it exists—or telling us it doesn’t. Go back to the source and substantiate it. We’ve opened another blooming box. 😂❤️

FINDOUTOLOGY™ — THE TABERNACLE TEST 🔑📜 Excellent start! Now the challenge is to establish the original legal authority, not simply repeat a modern interpretation. RESEARCH INSTRUCTIONS 1. IDENTIFY: Find the earliest documented use of tabernacle connected specifically to landholding, tenure, ownership or jurisdiction. Distinguish biblical, ecclesiastical and civil-law meanings. 2. SOURCE: Locate the original statute, charter, deed, canon, judgment or historical legal treatise. Record its title, date, jurisdiction, chapter/page and exact passage. 3. LAND: Establish whether the source identifies land boundaries, underground depth, ownership, possession, inheritance or rights of alienation. 4. TENURE: Determine whether the land was held of a superior, held in frankalmoign, consecrated, ecclesiastical or genuinely allodial. Do not treat these categories as interchangeable. 5. AUTHORITY: Identify who created or recognised the legal status and what jurisdiction or exemptions, if any, followed. 6. HISTORY: Trace subsequent statutes, judgments, reforms, repeal or abolition. Identify whether any part survives today. 7. CONCLUSION: Separate what the original document expressly establishes from interpretation, inference and unresolved questions. RETURN YOUR FINDINGS WITH: - Original source and accessible link - Exact quotation and page reference - Date and jurisdiction - Historical meaning - Later legal developments - Current legal status - Outstanding evidence IMPORTANT: If no original authority is found, record NOT ESTABLISHED. Do not invent a rule or assume that sacred, ecclesiastical and allodial land are legally equivalent. We're tracing the chain of authority from its earliest identifiable source to the present. Indiana BoneZ wants the ORIGINALS, not seventeen websites quoting each other! 😂 DON'T PANIC. FIND OUT. 💀🔎

@Paul Mcfarlane Cant open that

Got it