Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
PMP
16.1k
Free
8 contributions to PMP
Celebrating exam success + a few tips
Going in with a bit of Uncertainty - but in the end a successful completion, and very pleased with the results thanks to Andrew and TIA - AT/AT/AT. Andrew’s materials made studying and learning the material an easy process. The TIA exam simulator made preparing for the questions and preparing my mental grit to get through the 4-hour exam possible. Personally, I took all 4 hours (5 minutes to spare). My process was using the highlighting and strike-through, with flagging questions for review. I use keyboard shortcuts, so It made it easier and didn’t take much time to make the highlights. This made making reviews much easier coming back at the end of a section. Some pointers: 1) if you take the exam from home: your space must be sparse! Not just your desk. I had to clear almost my entire space - but I did t know this until checking in (maybe I didn’t pay enough attention to directions). 2) if you step away and set an alarm for your break - be sure to STOP your timer before restarting the exam. If it goes off during the exam it is a bit distracting! You can flag a proctor for assistance so You can turn it off - but you may need to exit camera view and then need to show your whole desk again. 3) if you have an external camera or microphone - that could cause challenges with compliance as well - best maybe to use a laptop with webcam build in. With regard to the material - I personally used AI to help me review the questions I got wrong and look for ways I may have been applying poor reasoning. Sometimes the AI would conflict with Andrew, but ultimately I used it to improve my personal understanding, reasoning, and logic to grow in my work as a PM. Understanding that every situation will have its own nuance, but how to recognize the multiple paths, with the goal to find the best path of all options for my given project scenario. Once you are done with Andrew’s course and understand the mindset, you will be setting yourself up to be a better project manager overall.
Celebrating exam success + a few tips
0 likes • 2d
@Nikola Janjic thank you!
Struggling with PMP prep. — need some advice from seniors!
Hi everyone, I've been using AI (ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini) to study for my PMP. Whenever I get a practice question wrong from Andrew's course or videos, I paste it into AI to understand logic and reasoning, and to see if the simulator answer aligns with PMI rules. Sometimes the AI disagrees with the course answer key and explains why another option makes more sense under PMBOK guidelines. But because AI can make mistakes or flip its answer when you argue with it, I'm second-guessing myself a lot now. Am I overcomplicating things by relying on AI? Did any of you use AI while prepping? Should I keep using AI to break down questions, or stick strictly to official study materials/simulators? Any tips or guidance would be greatly appreciated!
1 like • 2d
I just passed my PMP exam this week, and I used ChatGPT quite a bit along with Claude during my preparation. I ran into exactly what you’re describing. AI was most useful for spotting patterns in my mistakes, not grading answer keys. I uploaded my practice exam results and had it analyze the questions I missed. The night before my exam, I narrowed those down to 14 questions where I most questioned the answers or struggled with the reasoning. Looking at those questions together, we noticed recurring patterns: I sometimes reached for predictive tools in agile situations, focused on internal team processes when the problem was really client satisfaction, or jumped toward a solution before fully understanding what the question was asking. That was far more valuable than arguing over any individual answer. When AI and an answer key disagree, don’t treat it like a court case. Some practice questions are genuinely ambiguous, and two answers can represent different parts of a reasonable sequence. There was one posted by someone else here I was also following where AI and I favored C, but Andrew’s answer was B. Understanding why B was the intended answer, while recognizing why C was appealing, taught me more than trying to prove either one was right. A few things I’d suggest: - Ask AI to make the strongest case for both answers, rather than trying to convince it you’re right. AI can be overly agreeable, especially when you challenge its initial response. - Use AI to identify patterns across multiple missed questions. Are you missing concepts, misreading the question, or selecting a reasonable action that isn’t the best next action? - Keep your course and PMI principles as your foundation. AI is a tutor and thinking partner, not an authoritative answer key. - Don’t spend too long debating ambiguous questions. Understand the principles involved and move on. One of the most helpful habits I developed was asking myself three things before answering: Is this predictive, agile, or hybrid? What exactly is being asked? Who owns the problem?
PMP Certification
I’m thrilled to share that I have earned my Project Management Professional (PMP)® certification from Project Management Institute
0 likes • 2d
Awesome, congratulations!
PMP Exam Prep: I have confusion in the following PMP Practice Question. Can anyone help?
Hi everyone. I'm practicing for PMP exam, and following Andrew's youtube video "Complete PMP Mindset 50 Principles and Questions". Following is the attached question which I'm consused. As per AR's exam mindset and other guides, the answer should be C. but Andrew marked the asnwer is B which I'm not understadning. Can anyone help me in this specific question. Doesn't the PMP Mindset teach us to Assess/Analyze Impact FIRST before taking formal action? How do you interpret this logic for the exam? Would love your thoughts! 👇
PMP Exam Prep: I have confusion in the following PMP Practice Question. Can anyone help?
2 likes • 5d
I think @Abdul Moiz is correct to question this. One thing that is stated is before ANY analysis is done. The PM could do some preliminary analysis to bring to the sponsor for providing the change request. Full analysis would be done as a part of the change request. However, where this does stand out - is we are going to the sponsor for the decision. Since this is a change control item, the sponsor MAY be the person making the decision, but we should assume there is a change control board. The sponsor may be a part of that, but we should not assume that because they are proposing the change, that they are the one making the decision. The decision needs to go through the proper process. @Claire Lai, a note I would make is that the C answer is bringing the analysis (the work) to the sponsor for THEIR decision, not asking the sponsor to do the work of the analysis. Small clarification. One could argue the PM submits the formal change request after a sponsor, team member, customer, etc. identifies a need for the change. So I would say neither answer is actually correct, but B is the -best- answer because what should be done *next* is document the request, then analyze, then submit for review to the CCB/or designated change authority.
Conflict in the Exam Simulator and the 200 Ultra Hard PMP Questions
First of all, I want to say the training provided by Andrew has been super helpful! Even if I am getting questions wrong, it has already completely overhauled some of my internal dialogue. As I have been progressing through the practice exams (my mind is getting a bit overcooked) I went to watch the video to discuss the resons for answers. Immediately I came to the first question, and the video and the simulator had just slightly variant wording, but significantly differend answers. It says that I answered it correct in the simulator, but I would have been wrong in the video... My reasoning was similar to that of the simulator - we want them to work out the differences together - and the root cause analysis would not result in an answer yet, but a meeting would facilitate finding the root cause. But in the video, it says we do not know the root cause, so we should go for the root cause answer. My hope is that Andrews sample exams are just harder than the actual exam, because I found myself questioning a lot of very close answers. But this now has me even questioning if I would be right by PMP, because in this example, the same question with the same (or extremly similar) responses had two different "correct" answers. In my mind, I understand the principle - and I am curious if the simulator responses - with the more detail - actually did adjust the "correct" answer. I know the 200 ultra hard questions video is a compilation of other videos, and is now a year old - so just seeking some wisdom! Hoping to take the exam this coming week.
Conflict in the Exam Simulator and the 200 Ultra Hard PMP Questions
0 likes • 5d
@Claire Sung I was in the same boat - then the ultra hard questions got me feeling less certain. I then just ended up taking the questions I got wrong and revisited them again. There were only a handful where I still thought there was confusion around the question / answer options. But after reviewing several of them, following the PMP mindset more closely I would have selected the correct answer. So my takeaway was that the ultra-hard are really there to push the limits of looking at really close answers - but because the video was so different, I found that less helpful. I felt a lot better after just reviewing the incorrect responses and comparing my logic. Then reviewing if I was misaligned in how I was following the mindset. Good luck!
1-8 of 8
Chad Wojtysiak
2
12 points to level up
@chad-wojtysiak-9238
Project Manager with InterVarsity

Active 1d ago
Joined Oct 9, 2026
Powered by