how do you guy warm up cold Linkedin lead in to a warm one. if you have an advice or a proven way of doing it, sharing it with me would help me a lot!

is it a true that commenting on a lead post before connecting can boost my accept rate?

I have been using Linkedin as a way to get client for the past 3 week still haven't got any client but keep improve and learning. But the main point it for those that have gotten client from Linkedin, is connection with note or without note have a more higher chance to get accepted?

Law firm. Contract extraction project. Demo showing 94% accuracy on their actual documents. Walked away immediately. "We need 99.9% or it's not worth implementing." THE EXPECTATION PROBLEM: Partners expected perfection. One error in 1,000 contracts. Anything less - not automation, just another problem. Reality - 94% accuracy with 6% review queue producing 99.7% final accuracy isn't good enough if mental model requires 99.9% with zero review. Lost $8,400 project because couldn't align expectations with reality. THE LEARNING: Showed them the math. 94% = 940 contracts automatic, 60 to review = 6 minutes daily. Final accuracy 99.7%. "But that's still 3 errors per 1,000." "Your current manual process has 8 errors per 1,000 based on your QA logs." "That's different. We can train away human errors." Mental model: "automation = perfect" or "automation = waste." THE ALTERNATIVE: Different firm, same demo, same 94%. "Incredible. We're at 89% manually, takes 6 hours daily." "With review queue, 20 minutes daily for 99.7% final accuracy." "So 6 hours at 89% becomes 20 minutes at 99.7%?" "Correct." "When do we start?" THE DIFFERENCE: First firm compared automation to imaginary perfection. Second firm compared automation to current reality. First firm saw 6% review rate as failure. Second firm saw 94% automation rate as massive win. Same solution. Different mental models. One walks away, one pays immediately. THE REALIZATION: Accuracy expectations matter more than actual accuracy numbers. Client expecting 100% won't accept 95% even when it's better than their current 87%. Client expecting 85% will celebrate 95% as major improvement. Success isn't hitting accuracy target. Success is aligning expectations with reality before building anything. THE NEW APPROACH: Discovery includes baseline measurement first. "Show me 100 contracts processed manually." Most firms estimate 95% accuracy. Reality tests 82-91%. Suddenly 94% automated looks different. Frame against baseline, not perfection. "You're 87% accurate in 6 hours daily. We'll get you 94% accurate in 20 minutes."

I have been trying to figure out which bank app I should use but still can’t find it. Any suggestions?