Having an AI Policy is not enough. Who is accountable when AI gets it wrong? Giving employees permission to use AI is easy. Taking responsibility for what AI does is much harder. Imagine an AI system makes a wrong decision, exposes customer data, or influences a critical business decision based on inaccurate information. Can the organisation simply say, “We have an AI Policy”? Not good enough. This is where ISO/IEC 42001 becomes important. AI governance is not just about writing rules. It is about establishing an Artificial Intelligence Management System that helps an organisation manage its AI activities, risks, responsibilities and controls systematically. But ask these questions: ▪️ Who owns the AI system? ▪️ Who is responsible for assessing AI risks? ▪️ How are AI systems monitored? ▪️ Who handles escalation when something goes wrong? ▪️ Who ensures corrective actions are taken? This is the difference between having an AI Policy and building an AI Governance System. A policy explains what should happen. A governance system establishes the processes, responsibilities and controls needed to make it happen. Giving AI responsibility is easy. Taking responsibility for AI is a leadership decision. In my view, the real test of AI governance will not simply be whether an organisation holds a certification. It will be whether that organisation can demonstrate that its AI risks are identified, its controls are working, and accountability is clear when things go wrong. One question for business leaders: When an AI system makes a wrong decision in your organisation, who ultimately owns the problem — IT, the business function, or leadership? #ISO42001 #AIGovernance #ArtificialIntelligence #RiskManagement #Leadership