Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Jordan

AI Business Builders

145 members • Free

Our mission is to help members build profitable AI powered businesses faster than ever before, using AI agents and leading AI Productivity Tools.

Amazon KDP Book Marketing

88 members • $5/month

Helping authors increase book sales on Amazon KDP and other book marketplaces, such as Audible and TikTok shop.

Skoolers

161.1k members • Free

AI Story Crafters

276 members • Free

Opposite World Community

58 members • Free

KDP Publishing

2.1k members • $49/year

AI Automation Club

1.3k members • Free

Elevate Publishers Community

889 members • Free

Royalty Guild. Amazon KDP

241 members • $5/month

The Writer's Studio

603 members • Free

Write Your Books

462 members • Free

2 contributions to AI Accelerator
🚀 New Video: Stop Using Claude, Use GLM 5.2 Instead (Honest Test vs Opus 4.8)
The model I reach for first now isn't Opus. It's GLM 5.2 — a free, open-source model that's days old, runs right inside Claude Code, and on most of my daily work is so close to Opus (5x the price) I genuinely can't tell them apart. I gave both the exact same prompts. Here's the honest result. - Same prompts, both models. A sponsorship CRM app: GLM's was complete and worked (Opus's looked a hair nicer) for $0.40 vs $3. A Minecraft voxel world and an orbiting solar system: both nailed first try, and side-by-side you can't tell which came from which. - Where Opus won. A 30-second launch video. Opus shipped it in one clean 51-min run; GLM broke when its context filled up and needed retries — still $2 vs $14. Opus only really pulls ahead on the longest, hardest jobs. - Why it's cheap. 700B+ parameters but only ~40B switch on per task (mixture-of-experts), plus a ~1M-token window that holds your whole project. About 5–6x cheaper than Opus per token, and the gap widens on big jobs. - Why open-source matters. When Fable 5 got switched off overnight, everyone building on it had no say. An open model nobody can switch off is worth more than the price tag. - Run it three ways. OpenRouter (pay-as-you-go, ~2-min setup — point Claude Code at it with a tiny settings.json), Z.ai's flat ~$18/mo plan (daily use, official), or fully local for private data (but that needs ~$10k of hardware, so most people start on OpenRouter). My take: it doesn't replace Opus — it replaces most of when I used to reach for it. GLM's my default now; Opus stays in my back pocket for the jobs that have to be perfect first try. 📎 Full GLM 5.2 guide PDF pinned below — every build, the benchmarks, the cost, and the exact setup. Every prompt and the full setup are free inside The AI Accelerator (19k+ members). 👉 If you got it running, what's the first thing you'd build with it? Drop it below. [Watch the video here ▶️]
2 likes • Jun 30
@Kaushik Dutta It's on the right. I'm on desktop btw
I have automated 80% of my sales process and now I am helping others.
So I noticed most of the time sales is the same repetitive task done again and again. Like data scraping or buying it from a reputable source. Then data validation, like email verification and checking if the website and the client you got are high quality or low quality, and then filtering out the low quality and invalid. And then reaching out to the client through the most viable channel like LinkedIn, WhatsApp, and email. Previously the software didn't communicate with each other or didn't connect with each other at all, but now because of AI, we are at the point where AI can make simple decisions on our behalf, and we can be involved in deep decisions, like actually chatting with the client who is interested in our product and services. I have a technical background, and I am a 3D artist, so because of this, I managed to automate 80% of my sales process. Now I only do meetings and close the deal. I'm operating at a large scale, like sending 60,000 emails per month and sending 1,500 personalized WhatsApp messages and 400 messages on LinkedIn. I strongly believe that in the future there will be a lot of one-man companies and in thousands and thousands of dollars.
1 like • May 26
@Asad Patel well that’s weird. I always thought if we both followed each other we could then chat, doesn’t seem to be the case so. I’ll add you to WhatsApp.
1 like • May 27
@Asad Patel Only in communities, though. I thought outside of communities, you could still chat with people you follow, and they follow you back, but it doesn't seem that way
1-2 of 2
Jordan H
2
13 points to level up
@john-hones-7967
Qualified Agile Coach | 2x Founder | Author | Book Publisher | Entrepreneur

Active 16h ago
Joined May 22, 2026
United Kingdom
Powered by