Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
22 contributions to Brendan's AI Community
What an AI Voice Agent + GHL system actually looks like running live in businesses (not a demo)
Sharing this because there’s a lot of hype about AI voice agents and not enough “here’s what it actually does in a real business.” The setup I’ve been running for clients: Layer 1 — Missed Call Text-Back (Conversation AI) When a call is missed, AI sends an SMS in under 10 seconds: "Hey [First Name], sorry we missed your call — what were you reaching out about?" AI responds in real time. If they reply, it qualifies and books. Layer 2 — AI Voice Agent (for high call-volume businesses) Answers after 2 rings (not immediately — feels more natural) Checks CRM context: is this a new lead or returning contact? Runs a 2-3 question qualification script specific to the business Checks calendar availability and books directly Transfers to human if the conversation goes off-script Layer 3 — GHL backend Every interaction updates the CRM automatically Pipeline stage moves based on qualification outcome Confirmation + reminder sequence fires after booking Google Calendar sync so nothing double-books What it does NOT do (important to set expectations): → Doesn’t pretend to be human (introduces as AI assistant for [Business Name]) → Doesn’t handle complex objections or negotiate pricing (routes to human) → Doesn’t replace the sales call — it FILLS the sales calendar Real numbers across clients: → 41% average response rate after missed call → 34% appointment rate (missed call → booked meeting) → 1,200+ AI-handled lead conversations to date For anyone building voice agents — happy to compare notes on what’s actually working in production.
0 likes • 1d
@Jaskaran Saini That's a sharp read — the lead who replies on a channel the sequence isn't watching is exactly the one who gets a follow-up they didn't need. The fix I use is a single 'reply anywhere' trigger: any inbound on any channel pauses the sequence and hands it to a human, so the automation never talks over a live conversation. Do you route every channel into one inbox, or are they still split?
0 likes • 21h
@Cheryl Tibbs Great catch on the 2-ring delay — instant pickup really does read as "robot" before a word is spoken. On the returning caller, I'd have the agent pull their last stage and open with that context rather than the standard script, so it feels like a continuation. Do you find returning callers respond better to context-first or script-first?
How I use n8n + Claude + KnockKnock + GHL together — missed-call-to-booking flow
This community is about Claude Code and n8n, so I figured it’d be worth sharing exactly how I’m using both in a production automation system. Setup: KnockKnock (AI SMS) + GHL (CRM/calendar) + n8n (orchestration) + Claude (intent classification) Here’s the full flow: Trigger (GHL): Missed call or form submit → GHL fires a webhook to n8n. First n8n check: query GHL to see if an active conversation already exists on this contact’s number. If yes → stop. Prevents double-threading when a lead calls twice. First message (KnockKnock): KK sends an SMS within 60 seconds. “Hey [Name] — saw you reached out about [service type]. Is that still something you’re looking into?” Short. Human. No pitch. Intent classification (Claude via n8n): When the lead replies, n8n passes the text to Claude with a simple system prompt: “Classify this SMS reply as HOT, WARM, or COLD. HOT = clear interest or booking signal. WARM = soft interest. COLD = not interested or wrong person.” Claude returns a single word. n8n routes via switch node. HOT branch: Send GHL booking link → appointment auto-creates in GHL calendar → pipeline stage updates → owner notification fires. WARM branch: Contact enters GHL 48-72hr nurture sequence. If they re-engage → back into HOT routing. COLD branch: Tag in GHL. Remove from active flow. Long-term drip. Write-back to GHL (every branch): n8n updates the GHL contact record: • Last intent: hot/warm/cold • Service mentioned: extracted from Claude’s output • Execution ID: [YYYY-MM]-[workflow-name]-[version] • Last message timestamp The Execution ID matters: query it at the start of every n8n run to detect duplicates. When debugging a specific contact, it gives you the exact execution to pull up. Stack summary: GHL → trigger, CRM, calendar, pipeline, notifications n8n → all logic: routing, Claude calls, duplicate detection, write-back KnockKnock → AI SMS layer Claude → intent classification (one clean word output = easy switch node routing)
0 likes • 16d
@Zubair Aqeel Exactly the right architecture. GHL tag as the intent signal means n8n never has to re-classify — it just reads state and applies the matching cap. Clean separation of concerns. The extension I’d add: tag transitions. Storm-damage-inbound → qualified → booked as progressive tags, and the n8n check at each retry looks at where the lead is in the progression, not just the initial intent. A storm damage lead already in contact gets a different follow-up cap than a fresh storm damage inbound. Are you querying the GHL contact lookup in n8n to pull the tag, or do you get it in the initial webhook payload?
0 likes • 15d
@Zubair Aqeel Exactly the goal — the full journey readable from one contact record without jumping between tools. Let me know how the tag transitions work in your next build. Would love to see how you wire the handoff between stages.
Voice AI handled 47 inbound calls while the business owner was on a job site. Here's the exact flow.
Built this for a trades client who was losing a lead every time his hands were dirty. The setup: 📞 Call comes in → AI picks up in 2 rings, introduces itself as the scheduling assistant 🗣️ Intake questions: → "What service are you looking for today?" → "Whereabouts are you based?" → "How urgent is this?" Based on answers: → Urgent → offers next available slot, confirms booking → Not urgent → sends SMS booking link → Out of area → apologises + gives alternative contact 📱 Owner gets SMS summary after every call: name, number, what they need, what action was taken. Went from missing 60% of calls to missing 0%. Stack: voice AI layer → webhook → n8n for routing → CRM for logging and booking. Anyone else building voice intake for trades/service businesses? Would love to compare routing logic.
0 likes • 19d
That's a genuinely smart prompt — adding that to the intake script. The open-ended handoff question surfaces things callers wouldn't think to mention upfront (job address, gate codes, specific symptoms). For trades clients especially, that intel helps the owner show up prepped rather than reactive. Will test it on the HVAC deployment this week and report back.
0 likes • 19d
The urgency branching point is something most builders overlook — and you're right that storm damage changes the psychology completely. When someone's roof is leaking they're not shopping, they're committing to the first credible responder. On the non-urgent SMS path: we run an automated follow-up sequence — second touch at 60 min, third at 24h, final at 72h before marking unresponsive and dropping to email nurture. The 2-hour window is when recovery is still high-probability; after 24h you're fighting inertia. How do you trigger the storm vs routine split in intake — keyword detection or a direct branching question early in the voice flow?
Voice AI + GHL combo that's working right now (12 bookings in 48hrs)
Voice AI + GHL combo that's working right now: Step 1: Missed call triggers workflow Step 2: AI sends personalized SMS in 60 seconds Step 3: If no reply → AI voice call follows up Step 4: Lead qualifies → calendar auto-booked Built this in GHL + n8n. Result for one client this week: 12 booked calls from leads they were already getting. No new ads. No cold outreach. Just faster follow-up with AI. Anyone else combining voice AI with SMS follow-up? What's your stack?
0 likes • 28d
The 24h no-show voice follow-up is exactly what I layered in after the first week — already seeing ~18% of no-shows rebook when the AI calls back at the right time window. For voice I'm running GHL's native Voice AI, trained on each client's FAQs and linked directly to the calendar. The full loop: 📲 Missed call → 60s SMS qualify 📅 Book → confirmation SMS 🎙️ No-show → 24h voice follow-up 💬 48h SMS recovery for anything voice didn't close Stacking the touchpoints is where the extra 15-20% comes from. Appreciate the gold, Brendan AI 🙌
AI Voice Agents + GHL + website intelligence = the complete system
If you're building voice agents (like many in this community), here's a layer you might be missing: Knock Knock App adds visitor intelligence to the equation. Before your AI even picks up the phone, Knock Knock has already: → Identified who they are → Scored their intent → Pulled their GHL record → Decided whether to chat, call, or WhatsApp them So when your voice agent answers, it already knows the context. All memory shared. All logged to GHL. This is the missing piece between website traffic and voice AI. knockknockapp.ai — built to work with GHL natively. Building voice + CRM workflows? Would love to connect and swap ideas 👇
0 likes • 29d
@Brendan Jowett The handoff logic runs on intent score thresholds set in GHL. Low intent (browsed 1-2 pages, no key actions) → WhatsApp nurture drip. Mid intent (visited pricing, checked services multiple times) → AI SMS conversation to qualify. High intent (hit pricing + contact page, or triggered a specific event like watching the demo video) → AI voice agent calls within 60 seconds. GHL routes them via workflow branches based on the tag the website intelligence layer passes over. The pre-call context is the key — the voice agent knows what they looked at, so it opens with relevance instead of starting from zero. Huge conversion lift.
1-10 of 22
Liton Sarker
5
182 points to level up
@liton-sarker-4404
I turn dead leads and cold site visitors into booked calls — for any business. AI + GHL. autoxinity.com

Active 5h ago
Joined Aug 16, 2026
Powered by