Here's the summary options of Design Plan for the Marketplace: The core finding A true on-chain NIM-native NFT isn't possible — Nimiq's protocol only has four fixed account types (Basic, HTLC, Vesting, Staking) and no general-purpose smart-contract layer. This shaped everything below. Two complementary tracks (not either/or) Track A — Real NFT (Polygon + IPFS) - ERC-721 on OpenZeppelin, ERC-2981 royalty set per-token at mint time (goes to the individual creator) - Minting via an EIP-712 signed voucher: your backend checks ownership and signs off on what can be minted, but the user's own wallet pays its own gas and calls mint directly — no relayer, no hot wallet, matching how USDT payments already work in this app - Metadata pinned to IPFS via Pinata at mint time (solves a real problem: users can delete their library copy, which would otherwise orphan the NFT) - Non-custodial marketplace: atomic buy() splits royalty/fee/seller payment and transfers the token in one transaction, never holds funds or the NFT Track B — NIM Download-Rights Marketplace (reframed per your direction) - No ownership transfer — creator shares an asset (paying a fee to do so), buyers pay a NIM fee for repeatable download rights, split 80% creator / 20% treasury via two separately-verified NIM payments — no escrow - Anti-piracy: perceptual-hash comparison at share-time to block someone downloading an asset and re-sharing it as their own (images first; video hashing flagged as a harder follow-up) - Must be marketed as "collectibles," never "NFTs" — no blockchain enforces any of it Recommended order: Track B first — smaller, no smart contract, no new vendor, purely NIM (a stronger "native to the platform" story for the competition) — then Track A if there's appetite for the bigger Solidity lift.

Congratulation @Harley NSpace and all Cycle 1 projects... Good luck all on next cycles...

@Sam H @Mini Apps Competition I have similar doubts since my logs show no new accounts besides my test users from July 31 to Aug 10. I"m wondering if they tried the repo instead than my live product and of course it didnt run since my AI secret keys are not active there. Although i do agree Harley's product was more elaborate than mine. Regardless of the situation, i will like to get that feedback to understand what to improve besides marketing/user base which i didnt advertise full since im still doing changes for outsiders and normies. How can i contact them? Which are their Tagnames? Thanks

@Mini Apps Competition hi guys, can you let us know what are the main changes from the network upgrade? I want to check if it impact my apps.. thanks

@Josue Azofeifa same here... Thanks for representing CR Josue, pura vida!

Hi team, Thank you for today's session, very useful for all developers to listen to your questions and getting support from each other on tips and tricks. Here's my quick App intro for those who were not able to joined today: Other Me App Recommend to see the Session Video in the Classroom for more details on all projects!

Hi @Dany Nimiqfr , Google Gemini with multiple references and scene changes descriptions.. thanks for the feedback