Alex Lavaee and I did two masterclasses on this. This is the edited cut under 40 minutes so you can finish it. Your coding agent can produce a diff. You still decide what runs, what counts as done, and what evidence is good enough to ship. Alex walks through control loops and graphs, Atomic as a verifiable coding agent runtime, context as a budget, artifacts instead of dumping transcripts, durability and mid-run steering, and turning skills into inspectable workflows. Proof beats the model saying it is done. Watch: https://youtu.be/epg292lGCZ4 Atomic: https://github.com/bastani-inc/atomic

I really loved the 2-hr livestream, so I turned it into a website to ensure I understood everything that was mentioned in the video. Huge shoutout to Korealis, who was sharing amazing stuff, and thanks, Ray, for organising it. Looking forward to part 2 of the live stream. https://t3-code-explained.vercel.app

Thank you, @Ray Fernando, @Taymu San, and @Mason Crane! It was an excellent session today - my favourite take-aways were: - developer.apple.com - using the Design writeups - I'll go touch some grass and read it on my iPad! - https://www.ui-skills.com/skills/mengto/threejs - Meng To has another winner! Not only does he have aura.build (awesome) but now ThreeJS designs and MCP, too. I'll have to dive deeper into this! - Taking time away from the computer - and bringing that Human experience back to what you are doing... so important and a wonderfully timed reminder. There was so much more - loved hearing about what other people are doing, and the blockers they are facing. As always, I truly appreciated the opportunity to have some connection with like-minded people and hear some great ideas, too. Thanks again, Ray!

First, I’m looking forward to connecting with everyone joining! Here’s my focus: 1. What are you trying to make happen? Getting my complex next.js/react project to the last 30%. Most importantly getting proper QA after autonomous builds with many PR merges and a whole lot of agents doing side projects, gold plating, not actually following my clear TDD and SDD (nor properly using Playwright against my DoD, example mock ups, etc 2. What have you tried already? Matt Pocock’s system, BMAD, GSD(both old and new), Superpowers (I’m about to try pstack and ponytail to at least stop the gold plating) - I typically use Claude Code workflows with Opus/Fable plus Codex exec Sol and a Haiku wrapper for workflows / sometimes Codex directly sometimes with a voice agent orchestration - just started GrokBot but finding that is probably better for iteration than large spec / tickets / epics & stories? I tried one run with Atomic, mixed results - smaller things work great on that. 3. Where are you stuck? Getting the last 20% done and polished 4. What would a useful result look like? Finding a way to get that last 20% done rather than being the Human QA for literally everything! 5. What tools or systems are involved today? See above - maybe Cursor will be the answer? :) I don’t have that much experience with it yet - I have built hooks, etc for Claude, Codex, and now Grok Build. I use Matt Pocock’s skills, Ponytail, just started Pstack, (thanks Ray! Even Theo is talking about Lauren now!), a deny list a mile long (learned the hard way), GrokBot, codex etc.