Hello everyone! Little bit of a late night message but I didn't want to let it go, specially since -last call didn't record-, we had a bit of a brainstorming session running ideas on our most engaged members Here's the core Ideas: 1- The BRAIN Framework has grown a LOT, Research, Audience and Network are new core pillars that will help strategy. 2- New focus Now the Community should be oriented for implementation we will skip the concepts and jump into action, sharing horizontally, so I won't be the only one talking I'm giving the frame and opening the floor for sharing what works and what doesn't, and unleash the power of the AEO community. 3- A Knowledge layer: An intake survey will get you in your knowledge level, mindset and fundamentals is where people will get context to be able to jump into the AEO Blueprint, and to those that are ready to implement we might open a closed knit space that is divided on "tracks" so specific groups get more targetted resources, advanced AI guides and skills so the highly motivated members are able to generate new knowledge and build authority by experimenting with AEO in a focused group of individuals with shared goals and needs. That's the idea, let me know what you think in the comments

We’re all deep in debates about schema types, markup frameworks, and JSON perfection — what to tag, where to tag it, and how Google parses it. But in the rush to structure everything for AI, we’re overlooking the single most valuable piece of the puzzle: measurement. Traditional analytics was built for clicks. A traffic drop meant something broke. A traffic spike meant a win. But what happens when AI-driven search — Google’s AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, voice assistants — answers the question before the user ever clicks? That’s not future tense anymore. It’s the norm. Schema, structured data, and rich snippets are essential — but they’re not the finish line. They’re the instrumentation layer that allows analytics to survive in a zero-click world. Without measurement built into this new technical SEO stack, we’ll know our pages are marked up beautifully but have no idea if they’re being understood or surfaced. And we’ve seen this story before. We once pushed meta tags, H1s, and keyword counts so hard that clients eventually asked: “What’s our return on all this?” That question forced SEO to grow up. It gave birth to analytics — the proof that all that optimization actually worked. Let’s not repeat that cycle. If we don’t evolve measurement alongside schema, we’ll end up right back there: optimized, organized, and unaccountable. So here’s the real challenge: While everyone’s chasing perfect schema syntax, who’s building the dashboards that prove it worked? Clicks used to prove visibility. Now comprehension has to. The brands that measure that shift will own the next era of SEO.

I'm asking a buyer's question. How do I prove my AEO additions are working? I'm asking at several levels. I realize that specialized tools like "Search Atlas" can do things (50 ai crawlers), are there alternatives? Are there other ways? If I put a speakable schema on a site, can I ask "Alexa or Siri" to go there and read it back to me? [ I realize I'm all over the place with this question, but KPI's run on proof... ] What do we have now? What can we access soon? /// Trying to anticipate the #1 question people ask? Is it worth the effort... and when will I know? PLEASE lets brainstorm... Thank you Kurt

Something I’ve been noticing, I’ll ask the same queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini and they all give different answers. Sometimes slightly different, sometimes completely different. And it makes me wonder If even the AI tools can’t agree, how do we know which one is actually “right”? Is it pulling from different sources? Different recency windows? Different confidence levels? I’m genuinely curious if anyone here has figured out how to explain these variations, because I’m still trying to wrap my head around it.