Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
Inspiring Philosophy Academy

78 members • $25/month

39 contributions to Inspiring Philosophy Academy
🏛️ IT'S TIME 🏛️
Hey guys, the new course is finally HERE and we're super excited to roll it out to everyone here in the group. This will be a course that EVERY tier will have access to. It's called FOUNDATIONS. This course will help you build a firm foundation for learning, answering objections, building logic, and MUCH more. Today we're proud to release our first video within the Meta Skills module of FOUNDATIONS - "Distinguishing Claims, Arguments, and Evidence". This video will start you on your journey of understanding what objections are actually worth your time, and which ones are just straight up baseless claims. These new videos can be found in the "Classroom" Tab We hope to have a new video for you guys every week moving forward! So stay tuned!
🏛️ IT'S TIME 🏛️
3 likes • 16d
Let’s gooooo!!!!
New video!
This was one of my harder conversations I've had. I was trying to experiment more with where I could steer the conversation and took really long gaps between his questions to think. Made me feel stupid honestly. I think it was still a good conversation but it has been weighing on me. Not sure If I want to make a full video of the conversation.
0 likes • 20d
I think you still responded pretty well! Just based off the short clip, I might encourage to ask for further clarification from him what he was disputing. It did seem in the middle of conversation so I may have missed something.
The Shema
On our main IP channel I will be having a video coming out soon on the Shema. Specifically, muslims, jews, unitarians, etc. in general like to cherry pick deut. 6:4 as an anti-Trinitarian argument. They'll say things like "The Shema clearly states the Lord is ONE not THREE". In the spirit the video coming out soon. I wanted to see what you guys think of this objection. How would you about this?
1 like • 21d
I would say the shema is not speaking of numerical oneness but rather establishing the identity of Yahweh as Israel’s only God. Which is why Paul then includes Jesus in the shema, while protecting his filial identity with the Father as the one God.
Something I've Noticed.........
Now, this doesn't go for all online Apologists, but I have been noticing a consistent pattern of apologists standing while debating at their recording setups. For example, I've seen Than, Tim, John (Big John Steel), and I THINK Michael Jones also does it as well, but I cannot confirm for sure from his YT livestreams. Now this isn't "ALL" of the time, but it does happen enough for me to notice it. Is this something that everyone just does accidentally, or is it on purpose................... (BTW this is just more of a funny post, but I have legitimately noticed this)
1 like • Aug 2
Haha I cannot read more than 2 pages of a book without pacing in my room and reexplaining it as if I was teaching it like I didn’t just learn it🤣😂 helps with retention and creativity I think…
THE DEBATE 🔥
THIS SATURDAY I take on Mormonism 😈 Cannot wait for it all to go down. Save the date here: https://www.youtube.com/live/wHQYUMktxVo?is=9MSPQwtDC5yVhDzo
THE DEBATE 🔥
2 likes • Jul 23
What’s the actual prompt of the debate? Extremely excited though! Prepare to be strawmanned and misrepresented the entire time however!😂😂
1-10 of 39
Mitchell Hanson
4
85 points to level up
@mitchell-hanson-4708
Just an average philosopher for now…

Active 4h ago
Joined Oct 25, 2024
Powered by