I hear a version of this most weeks, and I take it seriously rather than talk anyone out of it. The thinking goes: a plan is for people with something to plan WITH. If the balance is small, writing it down just makes the small number official. Here is the part that flips it. A plan built on a balance does need a big balance to work, because the only lever it has is how fast you draw the money down. If there is not much there, the arithmetic is grim and you already know it. A plan built on monthly income does not work that way. It has a second lever. What arrives can go up. Somebody with $80,000 saved and one stream paying $600 a month is in a better position than somebody with $250,000 and nothing coming in but withdrawals, and it is not close. The first person has something that can grow. The second has something that can only shrink. That is not a reason to feel good about a small balance. It is a reason to stop treating the balance as the plan. So the smaller the number, the MORE the page matters, because the page is the only document that shows you the lever you still have. I was not starting from zero when I retired at 55 in 2022, and I am not going to pretend otherwise. But the streams came first and they started small. Results vary, and I am not a financial advisor. If your balance is smaller than you would like, what is the one thing you would put on line 3 if you had to pick this month? -Rich