Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Robert

Faster than vibe coding. Private AI tools to ship real systems while others prompt. We build businesses, not demos.

238 contributions to Snappy Community
MCP Dev Summit in Toronto
Some great talks here at The Linux Foundation's Model Context Protocol Summit in Toronto, and great people as well! Great to see what people are working on too - MCP has proven to have staying power in a market that moves very quickly. It is at the heart of the client engagements I am doing right now, because it not only provides utility and value at multiple levels, but also has a great deployment story. If you're building with MCP, or thinking about it, feel free to DM or leave a comment 🙂
1
0
MCP Dev Summit in Toronto
I've been using Jev a lot lately, here's why
I've been using Jev from TypeSafe a lot lately and honestly I think it's a very powerful thing, but it really depends on how you use it. The way it works is basically like asking an LLM a question, except instead of getting text back you get a typed decision: a probability, a confidence score, one pick out of a set of options, or a score on a scale. That's the part that makes it powerful for me. You get typed judgment back instead of a paragraph you have to parse. A good example is linting prose. Say you want to check writing for something that depends on meaning, not just a banned word. Regex can't really do that. A regular LLM can, but it's slow and expensive, and who knows what the shape of the output is going to be. With Jev it's fast, cheap and accurate, and you always know exactly what you're getting back. That's just one way to use it, there are a bunch of others. If you want to try it out, TypeSafe has it and it's on OpenRouter too: https://typesafe.ai https://openrouter.ai/typesafe
2
0
What technical skills do US companies actually need right now?
Been working with software systems for more than 10 years, mostly around backend, cloud, AI, automation, and product development. One thing I’ve learned, knowing a programming language alone usually isn’t enough. The harder part is understanding the actual business. How to automate work that’s still manual. Connect systems that don’t work well together. Build AI into real workflows. Keep the backend stable when usage grows. Deal with data scattered across different tools. These are the kinds of problems I’ve spent a lot of time working on here in Japan. But I’m curious about the US side. For people running companies in the US, what technical skills are becoming difficult to find? And what skills do you think companies will need more of over the next few years?
1 like • 9d
Honestly I think the hardest thing to find right now is someone with the full set when it comes to working with AI. Not just using the tools, but building systems that are reusable and shareable so the whole team gets the benefit. It takes the soft skills and the hard skills together, knowing how to work with these tools across all kinds of domains.
Question for people running companies in the US.
I am an entrepreneur and a tech professional. Been working with software systems for quite a while, and one pattern comes up a lot. The first version works fine. Then customers grow, operations get bigger, and little technical problems start showing up everywhere. Too many manual steps. APIs that don’t talk properly. Slow backend. Data sitting in different places. AI added, but not really connected to the actual workflow. Usually not one huge problem. More like five small ones quietly costing time every day. For those running a company now, what’s becoming harder on the technical side as you grow?
0 likes • 9d
For the businesses I work with, the hard part usually isn't one technical problem. It's their team learning new skills with AI and actually bringing that to the benefit of the business. What I've found is the owner plays a big role in that, so I start by investing in the owner's own systems first. That way they can see what's possible and experience the benefits for themselves as quickly as possible, and then it's a lot easier to bring the rest of the team along.
The more I use coding agents, the more I realize the bottleneck is shifting.
Writing the code is getting faster. Keeping the agent focused on the right problem is becoming the harder part. My setup lately is claude.ai for working through the codebase, github.com for the actual code/history, and floment.ai for keeping the project, tasks, and next steps clear outside the agent. Feels like agentic development needs good project context almost as much as good prompts. How are you guys keeping agents aligned on longer builds?
0 likes • 9d
Honestly the biggest thing for me has been keeping the context in the repo itself. I have a CLAUDE.md with the rules I've learned the hard way, and skills for anything I do more than once, so the agent follows the way I already figured out instead of guessing every time. The other thing I've been using a lot lately is Jev from TypeSafe, and I find it really powerful for a bunch of reasons. I have it running in my hooks, so when the agent stops, Jev reviews what it did against my CLAUDE.md, the spec and whatever other docs the project has. https://typesafe.ai Happy to show how I have it set up if anyone is interested!
1-10 of 238
Robert Boulos
6
1,267 points to level up
Founder of Snappy 🤖 Join my community to learn how you can build your app in hours instead of months.

Active 13h ago
Joined Nov 25, 2022
Canada
Powered by