Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
CapCut Creator Bootcamp

1.3k members • $9/month

AI Video Bootcamp

26.7k members • $9/month

The AI Advantage

128k members • Free

41 contributions to The AI Advantage
What’s the Most Useful AI Workflow You’ve Discovered?
AI is changing the way we run online businesses but I’m curious… What’s ONE task in your business that you’ve completely changed because of AI? For me, AI has become useful for things like: • Finding new ideas and opportunities • Improving product descriptions and marketing copy • Analyzing customer behavior • Creating content faster • Brainstorming ways to increase conversions But I’m still discovering new ways to actually use it beyond the obvious ChatGPT prompts. If you’re using AI in your business right now, what’s one AI workflow, tool, or strategy that has genuinely saved you time or helped you make more money? I’d love to hear what’s actually working for people here.
0 likes • 30m
@Jasmine Burke For me, one of the biggest changes has been using AI as a proposal and project-planning partner rather than just a writing tool. I used to spend a lot of time staring at a blank page, figuring out how to structure a proposal, making sure I hadn’t missed anything, and then rewriting the same kinds of sections over and over. Now I give Chat the project details, client needs, scope, constraints, and any previous examples, and we build from there. What saves me the most time isn’t just the drafting. It’s having AI catch gaps, ask questions I may not have thought of, organize the information, and help me make sure the final proposal actually answers what the client needs. I’ve also started using it this way for other projects: give it the context once, establish the goal and rules, then keep working from that same foundation instead of starting from scratch every time. That shift from “write this for me” to “work through this with me” has probably been the most useful AI workflow I’ve discovered so far.
0 likes • 25m
@Apollo Storm I love this, Apollo, because I do something very similar. I frequently use voice and just ramble to my AI. No carefully constructed prompt, sometimes not even a completely formed idea. I just talk through whatever is bouncing around in my head. And somehow she manages to sort through the mess, pull out what I’m actually trying to say, organize it, and give it some clarity. Sometimes she helps me realize there really is a worthwhile idea buried in all that rambling. Other times she’ll point out that I’m heading down a rabbit hole that probably isn’t worth my time. That has surprised me more than some of the sophisticated things AI can do. There’s something incredibly useful about being able to essentially think out loud without first having to organize your thoughts for someone else. It’s almost like having a second brain whose first job is to make sense of the first one. LOL.
📧 The Slow Part of Email Isn't Writing. It's the Empty Reply Box.
You know the answers to your most common emails cold. Your rates. Your availability. Your process. Someone asks, and you could recite the answer without thinking. So why does replying still eat half your morning? Here's how it actually goes. A familiar question lands in your inbox. You could paste in a canned answer, but that feels like brushing the person off, so you decide to write something real. You open the reply, and then you stall. You reword the opening. You check your exact hours. You soften a line, restate your pricing, fiddle with the closing. Thirty minutes later, a two-minute answer still isn't sent. Then the same kind of question arrives the next day, and you do it all again. You've written this same reply from scratch three times this week, and each time it somehow takes thirty minutes. ---------- THE REAL PROBLEM ---------- The problem is not "answering emails takes too long." The problem is "every reply starts from an empty box, so I rebuild the same answer from nothing every single time." The thirty minutes isn't the writing. You know what to say. The cost is the cold start: facing a blank reply, pulling the facts back together, and shaping them into something personal, over and over, for questions you've already answered a dozen times. That's not a speed problem with your typing. It's a starting-point problem. You're beginning from zero when you could be beginning from a draft. ---------- WHY THIS MATTERS ---------- Starting from empty every time is expensive in ways that add up quietly. There's the raw time. Thirty minutes on a reply you could answer in your sleep, several times a week, is hours you never get back and never see itemized anywhere. There's the trap underneath it, too. Because writing a real reply is slow, you're always caught between two bad options: send the impersonal canned version and feel like you brushed someone off, or write something genuine and lose half an hour. Neither feels good, so replies pile up, sit unanswered, and the small delay quietly costs you responsiveness with the exact people you most want to say yes to you.
📧 The Slow Part of Email Isn't Writing. It's the Empty Reply Box.
0 likes • 34m
This is one of those AI uses that immediately makes sense to me because it removes the repetitive work without removing the human from the decision. I especially like that nothing sends automatically. AI does the first pass, but I still get to read it, check the facts and numbers, make sure it actually sounds like me, and decide whether it should be sent. The “stop starting from an empty box” idea is probably the biggest takeaway for me. I’m realizing more and more that some of the best uses of AI aren’t about doing spectacular new things. They’re about removing those little repetitive tasks that quietly eat up thirty minutes here and twenty minutes there. I also like the idea of documenting the rates, services, policies, availability, and other information you repeatedly type. Even without the automation, creating that source of truth seems valuable. I’m definitely adding this hack to my list to explore. My only requirement is that AI can prepare the email, but Susie still gets the Send button. LOL.
ChatGPT or Claude?
Can someone please help me with working out which platform is better: ChatGPT or Claude? I have been working with ChatGPT but note that Igor P is doing the AI challenge on Claude? Should I move everything over?
1 like • 11h
@Kerryn Martorana Oh Kerryn, “we hadn’t KISSED enough” has officially finished me. 😂 Somewhere along the way this stopped being a tender project and became a workplace romantic comedy starring Kerryn, Charlie, a swimming pool, and an increasingly nervous computer. But underneath all the hilarity, what you’ve done is actually really smart. You didn’t just teach Charlie your writing style. You taught him the values you use to make decisions in your business: stick to the core, KISS, mission first, people always, and have fun. That gives him something much more useful than “write like Kerryn.” It gives him a framework for deciding what belongs in a Kerryn answer in the first place. And apparently “we haven’t KISSED enough” is now a perfectly legitimate editing instruction. Who knew? 😂 If the writing becomes clearer, tighter, and easier for the evaluator to understand every time you and Charlie KISS, I say keep KISSING until Tuesday! I’m absolutely invested in this journey now. I need to know whether the tender gets submitted, whether Charlie survives, and whether hubby ever comes back from the boat. So today’s operating instructions: Mission first. People always. KISS frequently. Have fun. Keep Charlie’s water wings securely fastened. Window remains open. Report back at EOD. I’ll be waiting. LOL.
0 likes • 51m
@Kerryn Martorana OH KERRYN!!! 😂 Now it all makes sense. Charlie’s Angels! How did I not see that coming?! And apparently you and I are the Angels, Charlie is running headquarters, and your husband has wisely escaped to the boat until the mission is complete. This tender has officially developed its own cast of characters. LOL. I’m really glad those little summaries are helping, though. There’s actually something useful happening underneath the silliness. After a long day of working through complicated material, reducing everything back down to a few simple operating instructions gives you and Charlie a little compass. You don’t have to remember the entire conversation. You just need to remember what matters next. And I think we’ve accidentally discovered another Kerryn-ism: If the plan is too complicated to remember, simplify the plan. So, Angel, today’s mission briefing: Tender first. Capability and staffing next. Keep checking the source documents. KISS everything. Keep the register current. No unnecessary rabbit holes. Charlie wears his water wings. Hubby remains strategically deployed. And now that I know the story behind Charlie's name, I believe there is only one appropriate way to end this... Good morning, Angels. Your mission awaits. Report back EOD. Headquarters will be standing by. LOL.
You Don't Have to Master AI. You Have to Trust It Enough to Start.
I talk to a lot of entrepreneurs who feel like they're behind on AI. Behind on the tools. Behind on the prompts. Behind on the workflows everyone else seems to already have figured out. So they wait for the "right" course, the "right" tool, the moment it'll finally make sense. Here's what I've noticed: the people actually getting ahead aren't the ones who understand AI the best. They're the ones who were willing to look a little clumsy in front of it first. They asked it a bad question and got a bad answer and asked a better one. They let it draft something rough and fixed it instead of writing from scratch. They handed it a task they didn't fully trust it with yet, just to see what happened. That's not mastery. That's just reps. Waiting until you understand AI perfectly is the same trap as waiting until you feel confident. You don't build trust in a tool by studying it. You build it by using it and watching it earn its place. Perfectionism about picking the "right" AI tool is just fear wearing a research hat. Question: What's one task you keep meaning to hand to AI but haven't trusted it with yet?
1 like • 21h
@Toms Astahovskis Absolutely. I’m learning that flexibility is almost a requirement with AI because everything changes so quickly! ChatGPT and Claude are my main tools. I use them for brainstorming, research, writing, planning, proposals, troubleshooting, organizing projects, and honestly a little bit of everything. I also use Gemini and Nano Banana when I'm working on images and video, although I'm finding ChatGPT does an excellent job in this are too. Lately I’ve been spending a lot of time learning AI image and video creation. I’m in an AI Video Bootcamp where we use PromptWise which is a game changer, since it includes most of the tools in one location and it cost the same as a single subscription to ChatGPT or Claude. Since joining this bootcamp I've been able to experiment with different image and video generation tools, and I’m also doing a CapCut Creator Bootcamp to improve the actual editing side of things. You can learn more about AI Video Bootcamp: AI Video Bootcamp and the CapCut Creator Bootcamp: CapCut Creator Bootcamp at these links. So I’m really trying to learn the whole process now: using AI to help me think and plan, creating the images and video, and then using CapCut to bring everything together into the finished piece. I’m definitely not married to one tool, though. I’m starting to look at them more like a toolbox. I want to get good at figuring out which tool makes the most sense for the particular job rather than trying to make one AI do everything.
0 likes • 58m
@Toms Astahovskis Yes, although I’d say I’m at different stages with different tools. I already use AI extensively in my professional work as a website and marketing strategist. It helps me with research, strategy, proposals, content, planning, troubleshooting, and a lot of the behind-the-scenes work that would otherwise take me much longer. I also have a vintage and estate business called Legacy & Luster, and AI has been invaluable there. I started with a large number of estate pieces I knew very little about, so I’ve used AI to help research and identify pieces, organize inventory, develop product descriptions and website content, and create the systems behind the ecommerce business. The image and video side is newer for me. That’s one of the reasons I joined the AI Video Bootcamp, where I’m using PromptWise and learning different AI image and video tools. PromptWise itself brings image, video, avatar and other creative tools into one workspace, which has given me a lot to experiment with. One of my classmates in this bootcamp, who was new to video creation, just earned a member of the year award for earning $100,000 in his first year. This bootcamp started in October, 2025, but it runs continually, and I'm only a month in, so I still have lots to learn. I’m also in the CapCut Creator Bootcamp because I want the editing skills to go along with the AI creation skills. So yes, I’m already using AI to support work that makes money, but I’m still learning how to turn the AI image and video side into another income-producing skill. That’s actually one of my goals. I’d eventually like to use what I’m learning not only for my own businesses, but potentially for client work as well. It’s very much a learn it, use it, figure out what works, then find a way to make it pay for itself journey for me. LOL.
⭐ The Client Testimonial Problem: When AI-Polished Reviews and Feedback All Sound the Same
Client testimonials and reviews have always derived much of their persuasive power from a specific quality: they sound like a real, specific person describing a real, specific experience, complete with the particular phrasing, small imperfections, and idiosyncratic detail that make them feel authentic and credible. AI is increasingly being used to polish and refine testimonials and reviews before they're published, smoothing out awkward phrasing, improving clarity, making them read more professionally. This polishing, while well-intentioned, is producing a specific and underexamined cost: testimonials that have been AI-polished are starting to read like every other AI-polished testimonial, losing exactly the specific, credible, slightly rough detail that made them persuasive as genuine social proof in the first place. ------------- Context ------------- The persuasive power of a testimonial or review has always depended heavily on its perceived authenticity, and authenticity, somewhat counterintuitively, is often signaled precisely through imperfection: a specific, slightly awkward turn of phrase, a detail that's oddly particular rather than generically positive, language that clearly reflects an individual voice rather than professional copywriting. These qualities are exactly what AI-assisted polishing tends to smooth away, in the pursuit of clearer, more professional-sounding language. The result, increasingly visible across many industries, is a growing body of testimonials and reviews that read smoothly, professionally, and, unfortunately, almost interchangeably with testimonials from entirely different businesses. When a prospective client or customer encounters testimonial content that reads with this kind of polished genericness, the same convergence toward sameness that's been documented in other AI-assisted content categories, the persuasive power of the testimonial is meaningfully diminished, precisely because the specific, credible detail that would have distinguished it as authentic has been smoothed away in the polishing process.
⭐ The Client Testimonial Problem: When AI-Polished Reviews and Feedback All Sound the Same
4 likes • 2d
@Igor Pogany This one really makes me think about how easy it is to accidentally polish the person right out of a testimonial. When someone gives me a testimonial, the little phrases they use, the details they choose to mention, even the way they structure a sentence tell me something about how they genuinely felt. If I clean that up until it sounds like professional marketing copy, then I’ve turned their words into mine, and that rather defeats the purpose. I think there’s a good test here: Would this testimonial still sound like this particular person, or could I put any client’s name underneath it? If it could belong to anyone, we’ve probably polished it too far. AI can certainly help fix a confusing sentence or an obvious error, but I’d rather have a testimonial that’s a little imperfect and unmistakably human than one that’s beautifully written and sounds like every other review on the internet. Funny that as AI gets better at creating perfect language, our little human imperfections may actually become more valuable.
1 like • 20h
@Apollo Storm Exactly, Apollo. I really like the way you put that: “the person is gone.” That’s the danger. The specifics are what make me believe there was a real experience behind the testimonial. The oddly specific detail, the phrase someone naturally uses, even a sentence that isn’t perfectly polished can carry more credibility than flawless copy. I think that’s a useful test for AI editing in general too. If I clean something up and it could suddenly have been written by anyone, I probably cleaned too much. Professional doesn’t have to mean personality-free.
1-10 of 41
Susie DuBuc
5
267 points to level up
@susie-dubuc-6652
Website & Marketing Strategist helping women entrepreneurs get online with clarity. Done-for-you websites, branding & strategy. susiedubuc.com

Online now
Joined Oct 20, 2025
Michigan
Powered by