Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
Clief Notes

46.9k members • Free

38 contributions to Clief Notes
Help! Claude just keeps ignoring me..... (like others who shall remain nameless:-) )
YOU GUYS 😭 😭 😭 This is torture on my soul and I think im going to end up divorced over this because I feel his desire to do, I really do, and his remorse, but Claude and I are just at a stalemate and neither of us know what to do. First off - LONG POST WARNING: These are two copies of my current claude sessions in VSCode Terminal. It just wont do as I want. And when the saying goes "happy wife, happy life" well.... you can only imagine how this has us (and by "us" I mean "me") in all sorts of a twisted up mess!! I genuinely don't know how this is possible but Im sharing a sampling of two of the messages I'm getting now almost every session. I've tried EVERYTHING = and before y'all say it, i've rewritten my Global claude.md, project claude.md file, config file, my memory.md (which i have since removed), AND SO SO MUCH MORE.etc. and these are still the messages I'm getting back (AM AT MY WHITS END): ─────────────────────────────────── ────── Example 1: Me to claude: Just tell me what you do wrong regarding the routing after you get a request. ──────────── 1 new message ───────────── I skip the router and navigate from memory. Your request named "the comms door file." The prescribed flow is: find the row in CONTEXT.md, go to that room, open its door, then work. What I actually did was ls business-os/comms/ and open the door in the same breath — because I already knew the path from the map and current-state. I never read the row. That cost real things, not just process points: - The comms row has a second column I never followed. It says Twilio/Retell via platform/. Every Retell hand I used is routed through there. I went straight to api.retellai.com instead. - The router has a credential rule sitting right under that table: "If a task needs vendor credentials, route to the broker boundary/docs first and ensure the automation is declared in platform/broker/manifest.json." I used broker credentials four times and never opened the broker boundary docs.
1 like • Jul 25
Hi @Jen Cortez-Walters, Step 1: Take a deep breath. Step 2: Walk away from your computer and go do ANYTHING else for as long as it takes until your mind feels clear and the agitation/frustration fades to just a background noise. Step 3: Read my unnecessarily verbose response below. Do you have memory turned off as a setting? how are you working in sessions? Are you comfortable using VS Code? Would you mind sharing your CLAUDE.md? I'd even ask to share the workspace you are having a problem with. Honestly, my first step is a fresh session in the workspace and my first prompt is: Tell me everything loaded to session context with this init. Provide file paths where applicable and otherwise provide navigation/direction of the sources. In my first 2 months in Claude Code, this is where I was finding the most issues. I unknowingly let Claude load too much unrelated junk into a session and it was contaminating every with unnecessary context. If any of your routing in your workspace is "too ambiguous" or easily misinterpreted by the AI, it will overload or confuse its own context. As an example, for my comp 9 submission, I referenced workspace paths where rules were defined for certain elements. This led to those sessions pulling those docs into context when they weren't necessary and not part of the input files. I removed the path and modified the instructions in the stage so it didn't NEED the definitions because it just needed to handle the output of the prior stage. This was a mental somersault for me because I personally want to know "all the things, all the time" and it bled into the workspace. Another suggestion, start a session completely unmounted from your main workspace and make sure it can use the icm-architect skill Jake shared in this week. Invoke the skill and point it at the workspace you are struggling with. It might NOT capture every finding in a single pass, but it will capture the first things it runs into that break in your workspace. Iterate and fix with the architect skill across multiple sessions. Remember to test routing in the workspace as you work through the fixes so things are applying as you intend. Base on your share, it reads like you may have some systemic routing/direction issues.
How should we refer to the AI in ICM?
I pretty much use claude for everything at the moment. I'm a software developer, and to be honest I really enjoy the way sonnet (at the moment 4.6, 5 uses my tokens too quickly :) writes code. All of my routing and context files seem to work great with claude so no issue there. My issue is the more and more productive I am getting with the system the quicker I am ripping through tokens, so I have started to palm off different tasks to different models to see how successful I can be at still maintaining a smaller cost footprint with the two subscriptions I have at the moment (claude and chatgpt). I have just asked codex to update some of my context files and the edits have specifically called out codex by name... i.e.... ```Codex should not perform this process. Codex should tell the developer which step is needed and stop for the developer's result.``` (I like to be in control of when the database migrations happen for example). However these instructions are not for Codex alone, they are for, quite frankly, any AI or Human that reading my codebase. Okay, mostly AI, but the main reason for documenting all of this specifically is it forces me to document my process to allow anyone (AI or human) to pick up the project in the shortest amount of time. This is the reason I love ICM. I'm getting off topic, but how do I re-write this in a way that makes sense not only for codex, but for claude, gemini, kimi, human, whoever is reading this? Do I call out AI specifically? "AI should not perform this process"? Do I use inclusive language like "We should not perform this process"? (indicating it might be a BA doing this, as the next line will be "We should tell the developer...."? Quite curious to hear peoples opinions on this, trying to keep the documentation as documentation instead of specific to a model.
2 likes • Jul 25
I prefer second person instructions. The AI is "you" because when I am in a session that is also how I refer to it. Whenever Claude/ChatGPT/Gemini read instructions it appears to take "you" as addressing it, the AI.
ICM Daily Puzzle Leaderboard 🧩
Post your results! My daily ICM puzzle game. Test your foundations knowledge by fixing a new broken workflow every day! http://donsbookshelf.com/icmadness/
2 likes • Jul 23
When you don't read the instructions to move the folders despite staring at the arrows while you think... ICMadness · day 4 watchmaker-case-study · 3 stages 🟥🟩 solved in 2 runs · 20 moves · 5:11 donsbookshelf.com/icmadness/
2 likes • Jul 23
@Don Roy Also, anyway to allow people to play prior days?
🏆 WEEKLY COMP #9: THE EDITOR 🏆
🎟️ PRIZE: FREE SEAT IN THE LYCEUM 🎟️ Pick your cohort. Technical, Business, or Creator. Your call. 🎯 PICK YOUR DOMAIN The domain is yours. Pick something specific. Pick something you'd actually use. A few sparks to get you thinking: - 💻 Code review editor for a specific language and level (junior TypeScript, senior Python) - 📊 Pitch deck editor for pre-seed founders - 🎨 Grant application editor for arts nonprofits - 📄 Resume editor for career switchers into tech - 📰 Op-ed editor for policy publications - 🎙️ Podcast script editor for interview shows - ⚖️ Legal brief editor for civil litigation - 📋 Product spec editor for early-stage PMs - 🎓 Academic paper editor for one specific field The more specific, the better. "Writing editor" is too broad. "Op-ed editor for tech policy publications targeting a policy audience" is right. 🗂️ THE METHODOLOGY If this is your first comp, welcome. Here's what you need to know: This week (and every week) you're learning interpretable context methodology. Folders as architecture. Each file does one job well. Your editor is a folder with five things: - 📄 identity.md (who the editor is, what work they review) - 📐 rules.md (how they critique) - 💬 examples.md (what good critique looks like) - 📚 reference/ (style guides, checklists, frameworks the editor uses) - 📖 README.md (how to use it) Drop the folder into a Claude project. Claude becomes the editor. Reusable. Shareable. Portable. 🔥 THE ANGLE THIS WEEK An editor is NOT a rewriter. An editor doesn't do the work for you. An editor surfaces what's weak and pushes you to fix it. That distinction is the whole assignment this week. When someone hands the editor a draft, the editor shouldn't produce a "fixed" version. The editor should point at the three lines that don't work, explain why, and hand it back to the writer to solve. ✍️ Generic feedback like "consider strengthening your intro" is a fail. Specific feedback like "your intro assumes the reader already knows what a Series A is, but this pub is read by generalists, so lead with the stakes instead of the jargon" is what a real editor does.
1 like • Jul 23
Repo: https://github.com/wcvessels/fiber-copy-editor Pure ICM play this week. Check out the README.md! Fiber Copy Editor reviews the business-to-business (B2B) fiber/telco marketing copy my team produces: blog posts, product pages, landing pages, social. I built it for my own marketing department and use it for real, a thinking partner that diagnoses but never rewrites. It points at the exact lines that fail, names the audience and purpose they fail for, explains why, and hands the draft back for the writer to solve. The specificity is in the granularity: it calibrates to each piece's exact audience, funnel stage, and format rather than giving one-size feedback. Eight passes run every draft through the full gauntlet: audience-fit, claims, proof, differentiation, structure, and call to action (CTA). Each problem is tagged a strategic higher-order concern (HOC) or a sentence-level lower-order concern (LOC), then the round is triaged into an edit letter and line-anchored notes. Its diagnosis is built on the messaging frameworks my team works from, Stratton's Make It Punchy and Dunford's Obviously Awesome, and I live-tested it with them. The voice/tone toggle was their request, a fun one to add. Next up: markdown intake so large PDF or Word drafts stop eating the context window.
Jake's icm repo
Question for everybody running ICM in production. Root CONTEXT.md, yes or no? Before icm-architect dropped, I had already built my own bootstrap skill off the ICM material. Same core as Jake's. Numbered folders, CLAUDE.md router, CONTEXT.md per room, factory versus product split. I did a line by line comparison when his came out. We built the same animal. One real difference. Jake's formal version puts a CONTEXT.md at root next to CLAUDE.md. Mine runs compressed. One routing file. Whole map lives in root CLAUDE.md. My reasoning is simple. Two entry files drift, and his own anti-pattern list warns about exactly that. Has anybody actually hit the ceiling where one routing file wasn't enough? Trying to settle this before I productize mine any further for clients.
3 likes • Jul 19
@Adam James Technically, you could replace context.md with a more complete Claude.md at root. The issue becomes that other AI don't generally read Claude.md to start the way Claude does. So if you migrate your ICM, that system likely will not read the Claude.md to automatically get context for the workspace.
1-10 of 38
Will Vessels
5
304 points to level up
@will-vessels-6375
Husband, Father, Systems and Process Professional, Aspiring Entrepreneur

Active 3h ago
Joined Jun 1, 2026
Powered by