User
Write something
🔶 Big Space-Time Antenna: how the supports and joints hold it together (design v14)
We're dealing with about 110 kg of copper: three nested spheres, 50 cm, 80 cm and 1.3 m in diameter, each made of 1.5 mm copper sheet. The largest sphere alone weighs about 72 kg. The challenge was to hold all of this, plus a fractal Merkaba at the centre, without any of them touching. They have to stay perfectly aligned, insulated from each other, and adjustable to the millimetre. The attached PDF (45 pages) and video are the answer. WHAT'S INSIDE • Three nested copper spheres (Ø500 / 800 / 1300 mm, 1.5 mm Cu: about 11 kg, 27 kg and 72 kg). That's 5 : 8 : 13, a Fibonacci sequence. Inside sits the Sierpinski Merkaba, driven at up to 5 kV and about 1.4 MHz. • Two lattice support towers (25 cm and 15 cm), each 3D-printed in one piece from polypropylene. Their struts follow 13 clockwise + 21 counter-clockwise spirals, again Fibonacci numbers, which makes them strong and light with very little material near the field. • Five joints (J1–J5). Each one clamps a sphere wall between insulating rings, so no metal passes from one sphere to the next. Under the big sphere, a Ø180 mm counter-ring spreads the load so the thin copper doesn't bend. • A height jack that can't rotate. One turn of the wheel moves the Merkaba exactly 1 mm. It sets and holds the 3 mm gap between the Merkaba and the inner sphere. WHY THESE MATERIALS • PTFE for everything near the rod and the Merkaba tips: it has the lowest loss at 1.4 MHz. • Polypropylene for the towers: it's strong and doesn't absorb water. • POM (Delrin) for the precision threads of the jack. VERIFIED The design was checked part by part: 120 solid parts, 0 overlaps, nothing passing through the copper, and nothing touching the Merkaba. 📄 The PDF includes: exploded and cut-away views, a technical drawing for every part (P1–P21), a 9-step assembly order, and a bill of materials ready for outsourcing. 🎥 The video shows step by step how everything fits together. 🔄 THIS IS A LIVING DOCUMENT The main principles are set, but I'm still iterating, especially on the height jack and a few smaller parts. When something changes, I'll upload the updated PDF here with a version number, so you'll always know which one is current.
1
0
This is how the big STA supposed to look like actually (3D Rendering)
According to Bashar, the big STA has to sit on a tower about 9 metres (30 feet) tall, and I believe one of the best structures for this is a Phi ratio hyperboloid, especially the one with the Fibonacci spirals you can see in the first and third image. A quick note on the towers. They are designed for the scenario where 48 of these antennas are placed in a grid around the planet to enhance the entire electromagnetic field. If the antenna works together with the Flash Matrix and is used locally, as a step-down transformer or capacitor, the tower is not necessary. Now the part I really want to share. All of these images were created in Blender together with Claude, simply by speaking. I described what I had in my mind and watched it take shape on the screen. Not only as a parametric model, but as the fully rendered images you see here. This reminds me of Nikola Tesla. He had the ability to see things in his imagination as solid and precise as real objects. He could build a machine in his mind, take it apart, put it back together and run it, all before touching a single tool. That is why most of his prototypes worked the first time. It is something we have known for a long time, and Bashar confirms it too. Using Blender and Fusion 360 this way gives all of us a version of that same superpower. The learning curve is basically gone. No more months of tutorials before you can make something. Anyone can take what is in their imagination, speak it into 3D software and see how it actually looks. So if you have a design sitting in your head, nothing is stopping you now. What would you build first?
This is how the big STA supposed to look like actually (3D Rendering)
The Geometry Atlas
After the Space-Time Cones, I'd like to share the bigger project behind it, the place where all of this geometry lives. 🌌 Have you ever seen the shadow of a four-dimensional shape? We can't see the 4th dimension directly. But we can see its shadows. A 3D cube held under a lamp casts a flat 2D shadow on the table. In the same way, a 4D shape casts a 3D shadow into our world. Flatten that again and you get a 2D pattern. That's what the Geometry Atlas is: a map of those shadows. 👉 https://allistarcenter.com/geometry-atlas.html What's inside Nine interactive models, each one you can rotate, zoom and look inside: 🔷 The six regular 4D polytopes, the 4D "cousins" of the Platonic solids: • the 5-cell, the 4D tetrahedron and the simplest 4D shape • the Tesseract, the 4D cube • the 16-cell, the 4D octahedron • the 24-cell, a shape that exists only in four dimensions, with no 3D equivalent • the 600-cell and the 120-cell, the largest and most complex of all, built entirely on the golden ratio 🔷 The 600-cell and 120-cell merged into one dual pair. A slider lets you grow one inside the other and watch the exact moment they lock together: when the 120-cell is φ times the 600-cell. 🔷 Nested Platonic solids and nested dual shells: tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, icosahedron and dodecahedron sitting inside one another, layer by layer, each touching the next at exact points. How you can explore them 🔄 Rotate in 3D, and on some models even rotate through the 4th dimension and watch the shadow turn itself inside out. 👁️ Look along the symmetry axes: vertex-first, cell-first, edge-first, face on, and 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-fold views. 🎨 Switch each shell on and off to see how the layers build up from the centre. 📏 Read every rod length in millimetres for the size you choose. Each model is also a parts list for building it physically from copper rods and hubs. The orthographic views: where it gets beautiful When you look straight down a symmetry axis, the 3D shadow flattens into an exact 2D pattern: rings within rings, stars within stars. The 600-cell even produces a 30-fold mandala.
The Geometry Atlas
Article
I was searching for something and found this article on researchgate. It is a beautiful read, for anyone interested. Thought I’d share it here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378230261_Consciousness_is_Everywhereness_Expressed_Locally_Bashar_and_Seth/fulltext/6a3b88774c90c55422be73d0/Consciousness-is-Everywhereness-Expressed-Locally-Bashar-and-Seth.pdf?origin=publication_detail&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uRG93bmxvYWQiLCJwYWdlIjoicHVibGljYXRpb25Eb3dubG9hZCIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19
Space-Time Cones-The √2 Cone...
Dear friends 🙏 I want to share something I've been working on for the past weeks, because I think many of you will enjoy exploring it, and I'd really love your input. 🔺 φ or √2? What we found when we put two cones inside a tetrahedron It started with a simple idea: build a Space-Time Cones coil, two cones meeting tip to base, and place it inside a tetrahedron, the simplest 3D shape that can exist. It has four faces, four corners and six edges. The design I modelled everything in 3D, to exact measurements: • Two cones, each 37 cm wide and 59.87 cm tall. That's the base × the golden ratio φ (1.618). • Each cone is wound with 333 turns of 0.8 mm enamelled copper wire. • The tip of each cone sits exactly at the centre of the other's base, so the two coils interlock along one axis and form one closed loop. • The whole coil sits inside a copper tetrahedron that acts as a reflecting, resonant chamber. • At the heart: a 20 mm crystal, and a disc carrying 21 golden spirals on top and 34 on the bottom, turning in opposite directions. Both numbers are Fibonacci numbers. So the golden ratio lives in two directions at once: along the axis (the cones) and outward from the centre (the spirals). 🎬 I explain the whole build with 3D animations in this video: 👉 https://youtu.be/33V1y5-eU10 What we discovered When we fitted the cones perfectly inside the tetrahedron, something interesting showed up. The golden-ratio (φ) cone almost centres. The point where the two cones cross, where the crystal sits, misses the tetrahedron's true centre by about 1.9 cm. Close, but not exact. So we tried a second version with √2 cones: the height equals the diagonal of a square drawn on the base. That one lands exactly in the centre. No gap, no offset. The geometry simply clicks. It gets better. Cut the √2 cone open, flatten it, and it makes exactly one third of a circle. Its base radius is exactly one third of its sloping side. It's a cone made of thirds. 🎵 And then the octave appeared
3
0
Space-Time Cones-The √2 Cone...
1-30 of 148
powered by
Allistar Center
skool.com/allistar-center-4289
This is the Metafusion community blending Technology with Consciousness, Science with Metaphysics. We connect what seems to be polarity into one idea.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by