User
Write something
Pinned
Post your Broken Process here
One thread, always open. Post a process that keeps failing and I'll break it down. Two get published in full every Thursday; the rest get answered in the comments. Use this format filling it in is half the work: 1. The process, in one sentence. "Getting a new client from signed proposal to first delivery." 2. What starts it. An email? A form? Someone remembering? 3. Every step, in order, and who does it. Include the steps you'd normally skip because they're "just quick." Those are usually the problem. 4. Where it goes wrong. Not "it's inefficient." Where specifically does it stall, get dropped, or get done twice? 5. What tools are involved. All of them. Including the spreadsheet and the group chat. You can anonymise anything. Say if you don't want it published and I'll answer privately in the comments instead. One warning: about a third of people solve it while filling in step 3. If that's you, post what you found anyway that's the most useful thing anyone can read here.
0
0
Pinned
Welcome to Blue-Line Systems Lab
Most businesses don't have an automation problem. They have a structure problem they're trying to solve with software. The usual sequence: something breaks, you buy a tool, the tool needs a process you don't have, so you build a workaround, and now you have the original problem plus a subscription. This group runs the other order. Understand how the process actually works, find what's slowing it down, then decide where automation or AI genuinely helps. MAP → STRUCTURE → DECIDE → SCALE. Start with two things Introduce yourself in the comments: • What kind of business you run • A repetitive task that eats your time • A process that isn't working properly • An automation or AI system you're thinking about building Then go to Broken Processes and post one process that keeps failing. The pinned post there has the format. I publish two full breakdowns every week, what's actually happening, where it breaks, what to fix structurally, and what to automate or leave alone. That last part is the point. A lot of what people want automated shouldn't be. It should be deleted, handed to one named person, or written down properly once. Structure First. Automate Second.
0
0
The Automation Readiness Checklist
Score before you build anything. One point per yes. 1. Does this run the same way at least 8 times out of 10? 2. Is it currently written down somewhere other than your head? 3. Does it happen at least 5 times a week? 4. Do the inputs arrive in a structured form (not a phone call, not a freeform email)? 5. Does someone own the exception path by name? 6. Would you notice within a day if it failed silently? 7. Could a competent new hire run it from the documentation alone? 8. Does it work reliably when done manually? 9. Is the person who'd maintain the automation still going to be here in a year? 10. Can you describe the whole thing without naming a single software product? 8–10 — Build it. This is a genuine automation candidate. 5–7 — Structure first. Fix the no's, then rebuild the score. Automating now locks in the flaws. 0–4 — Don't touch it with software. You have a process problem. Software will make it faster to fail. Question 8 is the veto. If a process doesn't work manually, no automation fixes it, it only removes the human who was quietly catching the errors.
0
0
The Wait Time Check.
Pick one process that feels slow. Write down the total time it takes end to end. Now write down how many minutes of actual work happen inside it. For most service businesses the working time is under 15% of the elapsed time. The other 85% is waiting: for a reply, for approval, for someone to notice a message. Automating the work makes almost no difference. Removing one wait does. Which single wait, if you deleted it, would cut the most elapsed time?
0
0
The two-tool test
Quick one for the weekend. Think about the last two pieces of software you bought for your business. For each one, answer honestly: what did you stop doing after you bought it? Not what it added. What it replaced. If the answer is "nothing, it's just there now," you didn't solve a problem. You added a place where work can go and not come back. This is the most common pattern I see. A tool gets bought to fix something, the old way never actually stops, and now there are two versions of the same process running at once. The spreadsheet is still open. The group chat is still where decisions actually get made. The CRM has the official record and the real record lives somewhere else. Nobody decides to run two systems. It happens because deleting the old one requires a decision nobody makes. So the weekend question: which of your tools didn't replace anything? That's usually the first place to look.
0
0
1-11 of 11
powered by
Blue-Line Systems Lab
skool.com/blue-line-systems-lab-9324
Build clearer workflows, stronger systems, and smarter automation. Structure First. Automate Second.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by