User
Write something
Pinned
🚨 New for 2026: Gucci Guilty Eau de Toilette Intense
Gucci Guilty’s 2026 arrival brings together a fresh salt accord, aromatic lavender and warm palo santo. A salty opening with creamy woods and a touch of smoke. 💰 Current Maxaroma offers: Gucci Guilty EDT, 90 ml: 38% OFF, now $70. https://get.aspr.app/SH1jkf Gucci Guilty Absolute EDP, 90 ml: 20% OFF, now $84. https://get.aspr.app/SH1X8r Gents, does this Gucci Guilty infographic reflect how these fragrances wear for you? Let me know which notes, intensity ratings or season picks you’d change.
🚨 New for 2026: Gucci Guilty Eau de Toilette Intense
Pinned
Introduce Yourself HERE!- Post ALL Intros On This Thread
What to say in your intro? Share where you're from, your reason for joining, perhaps your favorite fragrance, watch or a picture of you dressed sharp! It's a small action, but a HUGE step in you getting value from this community becasue you go from being a lurker to an ACTIVE member. In fact men that introduce themselves are 10X more likely to the actions to becoming their best selves. Bonus Point - By introducing yourself you're guaranteed to level-up. Seriously, you'll get at least 5-20 likes/points (oftentimes more) which will move you to level 2 and possibly level 3. And just like that you have access to more of this community!
Introduce Yourself HERE!- Post ALL Intros On This Thread
Noel Strikes Back
I don’t own any of these, including the dupe of Oud Zarian I got rid of a month ago: Amouage, Creed, Nishane, and Xerjoff. Glad Noel is striking back!
Noel Strikes Back
FRAGRANCE INFLUENCERS, CLONE HOUSES & THE COST OF COMPARISON
Independent Reviews or Marketing in Disguise? There has been quite a bit of controversy lately surrounding fragrance influencers, clone houses, and accounts reportedly being shut down over comparisons between imitation fragrances and expensive designer or niche originals. The recent discussions involving Nobilis Group and fragrance influencers have brought up a much bigger question for me. Are we watching independent fragrance reviews, or are we sometimes watching advertising disguised as honest opinions? Let me explain where I'm coming from. Why Not Review the Clone on Its Own Merits? I've never understood why every clone fragrance has to be compared directly to the original. Why can't a reviewer simply evaluate the fragrance for what it is? Talk about the opening, the blending, the quality of the composition, the development, the longevity, the projection, and the sillage. Does it smell good? Is it well constructed? Does it perform? Is it worth the asking price? Those are legitimate questions that can be answered without constantly attaching another fragrance house's name to the product. If an imitation fragrance is truly that good, shouldn't it be able to stand on its own? The Influencer Marketing Connection Here's where things get interesting. There have been plenty of discussions and reports about clone houses sending influencers free bottles, offering affiliate commissions, and paying for promotional content. Providing complimentary fragrances isn't inherently wrong, nor is earning money through sponsorships. But these arrangements create potential conflicts of interest. Think about how effective this marketing strategy can be. A company produces a $40 imitation of a $350 niche fragrance. Instead of spending heavily on traditional advertising, it sends bottles to influencers who compare the imitation directly with the original. Suddenly, we're hearing statements like: - "It's 95% identical to the original!" - "Why spend $350 when you can spend $40?" - "This actually performs better than the original!" - "You're just paying for the name!"
Nobilis Group Boycott
The fragrance world is in a massive uproar as luxury distributor Nobilis Group faces a fierce boycott from the online community. The controversy erupted after the corporate entity launched an aggressive legal and digital crackdown against budget-friendly perfume "dupe" brands. To protect its high-end brand equity, Nobilis successfully sued clone giant ÉCLAT, legally banning them from using "smells like" comparisons or utilizing consumer reviews to market affordable alternatives to luxury fragrances. However, the corporate victory quickly triggered a massive backlash when Nobilis began issuing intellectual property strikes against social media influencers. The outrage peaked when popular creator Noel Deyzel's secondary account, "Noel Smells," which had 1.8 million followers, was permanently banned from TikTok for reviewing affordable clones. Other fragrance reviewers have reported content strikes and video deletions, causing a wave of censorship fear that has forced creators to actively scrub the word "dupe" from their channels. In retaliation, the online community has mobilized a widespread boycott targeting the prestigious luxury and niche brands distributed by Nobilis, including powerhouse names like Creed, Xerjoff, and Amouage. Enthusiasts and creators are rallying fans to stop purchasing these high-end scents in hopes that the luxury perfume houses will pull their distribution contracts from Nobilis over the unfolding public relations disaster. Meanwhile, support is surging for budget alternative houses like ÉCLAT, Bujairami, and Vantage. What started as a corporate legal battle over marketing definitions has officially transformed into a digital class war, pitting everyday consumers and independent creators fighting for affordable scent alternatives against corporate entities accused of greed and censorship. Share your thoughts on this and tell me if does it color your future purchases?
1-30 of 46,364
Brotherhood Of Scent
#1 Fragrance Community 🏆
Our mission is to help YOU leverage the power of scent to become the man you know yourself to be.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by