Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
GenHQ - Creative AI Education

1.6k members • $97/m

AI Launchpad

34.4k members • Free

NextGen AI

53.5k members • Free

AIography

905 members • Free

Master The Workflow

188 members • $9/m

1 contribution to AIography
The Week AI Stopped Being a Question
Something quietly tipped over this week, and today's newsletter is all about it. For a couple of years now, the AI-in-film conversation has mostly been an argument. Is it real? Is it cheating? Is it going to stick? This week the argument got a tiebreaker, and it came from about the most credible voice there is. George Lucas said AI is the future of the medium. His actual words: "Artificial intelligence means it's much easier for us to make movies," and "There's nothing you can do about it. That's progress; it's the future." That's the person who built the modern blockbuster telling you the door is open. And it's not just talk from the sidelines. The same week, the biggest streamer on earth put a number on it. In its quarterly letter to shareholders, Netflix said creative partners used generative AI across roughly 300 titles this year, mostly in post-production. Not a demo. Not a pilot program. Three hundred titles, on the record, to Wall Street. Put those two together and the shape of the week is hard to miss. The most famous names and the biggest money landed on the same side, out loud, at the same time. In today's full newsletter, I walk through what that actually means for working creators, plus the honest other half: a director who shipped a 135-minute AI feature almost by himself, Christopher Nolan calling the whole thing a trap from the other side of the same week, and a couple of new tools you can actually put to work. It's a five-minute read, and it's built to help you decide what to use and what to keep your hands on. Read the whole thing here: https://aiography.beehiiv.com/p/george-lucas-says-ai-is-the-future-of-movies Here's the thing I keep landing on. When a tool goes from "maybe" to "here to stay," the interesting question stops being whether you use it. It becomes what you refuse to hand over. The tools are settling. Your judgment is the part that still can't be automated, and this week made that clearer, not less.
2 likes • 29d
@David Harrison No problem. I am going to make more of an effort to engage in here. I feel like maybe a lot of people are just burnt out with all the stuff going on in the industry (and world) and trying to find out where they are in the general landscape. My background was on set as a pa/ad and then moving onto assisting writers, director and producer. Post was something I was always intrigued by, but as I got further on my path, I got further away from post. Once I decided to go all in, the industry crashed due to covid and strikes. And now AI is throwing things out of whack too. I love learning new things, so I'm all in on AI, creatively anyway. I added some images I generated in Midjourney as my starting points.
0 likes • 19d
@Lawrence Jordan Hi Larry. I did not use AE at all. Strictly Seedance for video generation. I currently use Claude, Midjourney, Higgsfield (Nano Banana Pro, Seedance 2.0), Suno for music, Artlist for soundFX (one day hopefully Boom Library 😎) and DaVinci Resolve for post. I have provided the full prompt I used for one of my Seedance video generations. It was a 15 second clip, generated at 1080p. You could go shot for shot, as well, and what you would do in that regard is have a start frame (the last frame of the first shot as the start frame for the second shot) so that way the shots work seamlessly together, if that's what you are after. ***The <<<?>>> are the place holders for the elements I created to "attach," if you will, to the prompt so I can get the consistency I am after. It's not 100% full proof, but pretty damn close. Ultimately, the idea is to be able to have some usable footage to cut together and regenerate parts of the video that you'd like to tweak, while maintaining character consistency. SHOT 1 (0-4s) — The Walk - EFFECT: none — clean handheld tracking - Low-angle tracking shot moving backward in front of him as he walks steadily down the dirt path , <<<421b25fa-f1a9-4b0e-937c-fa33886ab8cb>>> , weathered tan face set flat and unbothered, toothpick (pale birch, "GenHQ" etched mid-shaft) <<<6678cc6d-bfc0-4e69-a3ea-fdc554efe22c>>> rolling slightly at the corner of his mouth. Black suit jacket shifts with each stride, white shirt and black tie crisp against the tan skin. The cantilevered concrete-and-glass house glows warm against its boulder outcrop in the background, golden light raking across the granite. - 35mm lens, tracking dolly at knee-to-hip height, slight handheld breathing - SFX: rhythmic crunch of pebbles underfoot, distant desert wind - Transition: cut to profile as the car enters frame SHOT 2 (4-7s) — Approach / Car Reveal - EFFECT: rack focus - Wide shot, camera holds static as he <<<aba152d3-7ae7-482e-9feb-51c739b782c8>>> continues walking; the black 1966 Cadillac Coupe de Ville <<<d804f319-42db-4f61-bb9a-c17748f7f086>>> sits in sharp foreground focus at a pure side-profile angle — chrome side spear and wire wheel covers catching the low sun, whitewalls bright against the dirt — while he closes distance in the middle ground. Focus racks from car to man as he nears.
1-1 of 1
Anthony Steinhart
2
2 points to level up
@anthony-steinhart-6693
Happy to be here.

Active 2d ago
Joined Oct 14, 2025
Powered by