Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
AI Automation Society

441.4k members • Free

AI Automation Vault

32.2k members • Free

AI Masters Community with Ed

19.2k members • Free

Clief Notes

46.2k members • Free

3 contributions to Clief Notes
how do I get started with ICM ? is it right for me ?
context I am currently working on an educational website, a platform featuring videos ,animations, documents etc Here is my current setup : point my ai agent (claude right now ) to the docs/ folder to understand the project and build a mental map to start working on the next goal (see screenshot N1) -I am a single "developer" working on this project with 0$ budget -Static front-end +dynamic backend (php) From what I understand ICM consists of simple markdown files and folders structured to function as an orchestration layer I know I did not provide enough context but just based on my current situation what advice do you have for me ? does ICM Fits My Project ?
how do I get started with ICM ? is it right for me ?
How are you backing up your AI workspace?
I spent this week hardening my workspace setup and fell down the backup rabbit hole. Sharing the thought process because I want to know what everyone else is doing. My whole workspace lives under local git. I don't keep it there for code reasons. The win is auditing: every change is signed, human or agent, and I can see exactly what the AI did each session and roll any of it back. Once you let agents write into your folders, that flight recorder stops feeling optional. But git pulls a thread. A live repo can't sit inside OneDrive or iCloud. Sync engines fight the history layer: conflicted copies, placeholder files the agent can't actually read, endless re-upload of thousands of tiny .git objects. So the workspace has to move OUTSIDE the one backup most people already have. Which means backup now needs its own answer. The thing that clicked for me: a backup has to answer two different questions. "Give me my files back" and "give me my history back." Most setups only answer the first. OneDrive only answers the first. My own answer is three layers (external drive snapshot, remotes for the code, encrypted offsite for history) but I'm the nerd who enjoys that. The version I keep kicking around for everyone else: the agent zips the whole workspace, history included, and drops a dated zip into the OneDrive folder you already pay for. Keep the newest two, delete older. Sync can't host a live repo, but it carries a dead zip just fine. So what are you actually doing? Do you run git over a non-code workspace, and was the auditing worth the extra layers? What is your backup story for the folders your agents work in? Has OneDrive or iCloud alone ever actually saved you, or does it just feel safe?
3 likes • 9d
Heard of GitHub, nah? Just kidding 😄 Honestly I'd rather go homemade. Grab a 1TB HDD and an old server off Facebook Marketplace — that's the whole setup, maybe $100 total. Local git repos can't live in OneDrive anyway, so the cloud was never the answer for this. And personally? I just don't trust cloud storage to be there when it matters. A box in my house doesn't ask me to accept terms of service.
2 likes • 9d
@Jim Tyndall Fair point about the one building — that's the hole in the plan and I won't pretend it isn't. Best I can do is say the box is throwaway cheap, so if it dies it's an afternoon to rebuild, not a disaster. To answer your actual questions: yes, it's a real remote, not a copy-paste folder. I push repos to it like a git remote, so it gets the full history layer, not just the current state. No, it doesn't snap file-level versions like a backup tool — it's git's history or nothing. Which is exactly your mirror-of-a-mistake problem: it'll happily accept a git push -f that wipes the good history. So honest answer: the box is better than nothing, but it's a convenience layer, not a disaster story. The one thing that actually survives a fire is the code that's also up on GitHub as a remote. Which... is the cloud I said I don't trust. Somewhere in there is a contradiction, I'm just not ready to deal with it yet 😄. Anyone else care to share their backup setup
Can Tokens Be Made Unlimited?
I know that most people would say that if you self host a model that technically by that standard do you have unlimited token usage, the speed of which is depending on the hardware that you’re running the model on. I have found a way to use multiple interfaces simultaneously inside a harness, to generate unlimited token usage without having to self host a model. It came from a simple personal problem with my hardware and the frustration that API and model based services either charge you a monthly usage to access models, or throttle your limits by daily or weekly usage limits. I found that these bottlenecks and gatekeeping caused me to evolve in a way with this process that had me think of nothing but workarounds and gate breaking. The solution, something so simple it does not a wonder to me that my mind came to it. It starts with first getting the right harness, whether it be Hermes, or any other agent system. The first part involved something that came to me about the concept of what in AI system is. It is basically just like a human, except it has the capacity to learn what would seem like instantaneously a lifetime worth of knowledge, skills, and tools at a rate that a human takes most of its lifetime to achieve.I figured write out the box, the first thing I should do is make sure that my model harness had all the possible skills needed for things like coding, content, creation, context and comprehension skills, and pretty much any skill or tool that I would need to accomplish anything that I would come across in the future. Then I realized that as a human has to build memory over time, so does AI. That’s something we share, learning and memory retention. I first installed everything to do with memory retention so that the system harness could remember everything it learned, evolve as it learned better ways to achieve things, structured it in a way that would speed up its process, and reduce token usage from the get-go. In that process I also realized that obviously AI is so smart, especially when given a very large skill set from the get-go, that skills that are made for something like OpenAI Codex or Claude coworker or Claude code, the harness with all it skills could rework the code, especially if it was trained with code to make it work for itself, and do the appropriate retrofits to be able to use such things, even though they were made for other harnesses or models. I can list if someone is interested in where. YouTube is an amazing resource. The next revelation was, there are multiple services that offer free usage of multi models. This really peaked my cheap 🧠, as I figured I don’t wanna have to pay so much just to learn the basics and to start building any kind of foundational anything and get nowhere while bleeding money from token usage and API access. So what do we do? We learn to model route through multiple open sources like Ollama, OpenRouter, Nous( creators of Hermes), using parameter strict to our hardware capabilities on the mid to low range as a absolute, fallback model. So then I asked my agent to help me build a model routing system, and monitor usage and give me warnings as I was approaching usage, give me the option to switch models when I hit 80 to 90% usage on any model. I also learned that if I want to get things cooking very fast I should use cloud based models through Olamma or Openrouter and max those out they crunch out all the hard work that a less capable model would have token strain figuring out. So I use the big hammers first then I use the little hammers to continue then I fall back to the big hammers to hit the finish line. always having a free model in the pipeline plus the skills that I built in in the beginning to reduce token usage from things like context understanding of what I’m prompting or trying to achieve.
1 like • 12d
Great post — you've clearly gone down the same rabbit hole I have. Couple of things I'd add based on what I've actually built and tested: 1. **Model routing is the right move.** I've got an opencode harness running on a cheap ASUS TUF with 8GB VRAM. The trick is having a **failover chain** that actually works. On my setup: - Gemini 3.6 Flash is the daily driver (~12s agent runs) - If I hit the daily cap, OpenRouter's `nemotron-3-super-120b:free` takes over (~20s) - Local `reason:32k` (Ollama) is the privacy fallback when I don't want cloud 2. **Skills vs catalog cost — this killed me until I measured it.** The Claude Code skills auto-load into opencode. Full catalog of ~66 skills cost ~7,775 tokens per request. I filtered it down to 6 real skills that actually apply, cut that to ~700 tokens. That's 30% more window on a 32k local model. 3. **One gotcha that cost me a day:** If you're routing through the OpenAI-compatible path for Gemini, it breaks on the **second tool call** — `thought_signature` error. You need the native `google/` provider ID, not `gemini/`. 4. **Free tiers rot fast.** `gemini-2.0-flash` went to `limit: 0` (not quota — zero free allocation). `cerebras/*` models are all 402 Payment Required now. Groq's TPM varies by model (8k vs 12k). Only 17 OpenRouter models are genuinely free right now (and DeepSeek isn't one of them — they bill). **Question for you:** Which harness are you running? You mentioned Hermes. I haven't tested that one in anger yet. How are you handling tool-call structure across different providers? That's the part that bit me hardest — some emit JSON, some emit plain text, and the harness has to handle both. Not trying to write a thesis — just sharing what actually broke in the field. If you want, I can list the exact model IDs I'm using (verified live, not just catalog).
1-3 of 3
Raymond Kenny
2
10 points to level up
@raymond-kenny-6083
I'm a passionate developer , you'll probably find me exploring new technologies or contributing to open source.

Active 12h ago
Joined Aug 9, 2026
Powered by