Someone asked about the three plans, so: Right now everyone here pays nothing. Not a trial, not a cut-down version. You get all of it, including the hosted one where I run the server and you just connect your AI. 🧾 So why three buttons Standard is $0. You run catknows on your own computer. The code is public and it is yours, so this one stays free whatever happens to the rest. Premium is $7 a month. That is the hosted one, where I run the server and you skip the setup. Free while we are small. VIP is $67 a month and gets you nothing extra. Not a single feature. You would be paying so that everyone else does not have to. That is the whole thing. ⏳ The bit worth reading twice At 100 members, Premium starts costing money. Servers do that. Everyone here before then keeps it free. Forever. Not free for a year, not free until I change my mind about it. We are at 39. 🐾 And if you never want to pay me anything Then don't. Standard is the full tool, running on your machine with your login, and your data never leaves the house. The free version is not going to quietly get worse. That would defeat the point of having built this. Questions in the comments 👇

Quick follow-up to our `list_members` testing. We went quite a bit deeper after the latest fix and found two separate things. 𝟭) 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿-𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝘅 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗱-𝘁𝗼-𝗲𝗻𝗱 - Hosted Catknows still gets a 403 on Skoolers, where I'm only a regular member. - On another regular-member community, pagination starts repeating page 1 after member 30. So a request for 65 can appear successful while actually returning duplicated members. - At the same time, Skool's own authenticated browser requests repeatedly return 200 with `t=active`, including sorting, filtering and page 2. So `t=active` itself doesn't appear to be the universal trigger; the difference looks more request/context-specific. 𝟮) 𝗦𝗸𝗼𝗼𝗹'𝘀 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 We mapped and verified the actual `members.json` parameters for: - lifecycle: active / cancelling / churned / banned - sorting: newest / last active / most points - status: admins / online - billing: free trials / monthly / annual / 1-time / free - tiers: Standard / Premium / VIP - course access, including multiple courses - mixed filters - page-number pagination We also verified that the Boolean behaviour differs by filter family: for example, tiers behave as OR, while multiple course IDs and separate status/billing flags behave as AND. The attached PDF contains the full reproduction, verified query grammar, pagination safeguards, suggested MCP schema, and acceptance tests so the implementation can be worked from directly. 🐾

Quick pulse check, hoomans. Vote down below 👇 Already tested it? Drop your feedback in the comments. The good, the bad, the "why does the cat do THAT". Not yet? bffr. Here's the whole thing, 5 minutes flat: Go to catknows.app Set up your account Connect it to your AI (ChatGPT, Claude, whatever you use) Then the actual test: tell your AI to write a feedback post right here in this community using catknows. That's it. That's the test. 😼 Classroom videos are in the works, coming soon. Why now: catknows replaces the CRMs and all the other tools you're paying for. For free. Once we hit 100 members, the hosted service at catknows.app goes paid (not much, $7/month, but paid). Everyone who's in before that keeps it free. Forever. And if you can handle a computer (or your AI can), the open-source version runs on your own machine for free anyway. So tell your friends. You're doing them the biggest favor of their tool-buying lives: stop paying for stuff you can get for free. Yes, all of you 🐾: @Keith Berg @Angela Day @Ben B. @Kaseem Bradley @Jenna Kelly @Blue Mojo @Dan Schaad @Elfina Luk @Iyaraa Iam @Stefan Butteweg @Frances Scully @Mindy Molein @Sean Hegarty @The Skool Cat @Allan R. @Mercedes Aspland @Rositsa Aleksandrova @Joseph Isosaki @Lydia Lowery Busler @Éva Raposa @Nicole Horton @Joe DeFilippo @Tommy Gan @Ina Tenniswood @Mark Zammit @Adrian Callejas @Fiona Morris @Marius Prigge

@Niklas Schröer I am wondering if you have been exploring things and figure out any patterns, signs or indication to do with communities in Public vs Private mode? Pros : Cons Indexing : Members holding back Anything that might compare the 2 modes ? Any data on that at all of if the Cat might be curious and dig up some gems !? 😸🪏💎🔥🌱🎯🚀💛

Setup for these tests: Catknows running locally on Windows and connected to ChatGPT/OpenAI via MCP. I will use this thread to log anything we encounter while testing it through ChatGPT.