Chapter Renumbering! Right Click on a folder of files in your book and there is a new option "Renumber Chapters"! This will rename and renumber all of the files in the folder in the order they are found in, so you do have to rearrange the files by hand so they are in the order you want them in. Before After Ch. 7 - The Fall Chapter 1 - The Fall chapter two: Smoke. Chapter 2: Smoke 03 Homecoming. Chapter 3 Homecoming The Long Road. Chapter 4 The Long Road 1984 Chapter 5 1984 Let me know what else you need or if this needs more options

I'm going to pin this to the beginning of the page and would like it see if everyone wanted to post their books that they've written on here. You can post as many links as you want as often as you want. I'd like to celebrate wins for everyone!

This is the first of many things that came of this weekend's research run and using my Claude time for the week in two days! Close to 4000 emails were analyzed, combined organized and what came of it is 4 books, 24 articles and a possible future class for sale. This is the article that created the Provenance Assurance Layer in WCP. ***** In August, one of the largest online-writing schools told its list that Anthropic's new watermarking would punish lazy writers and reward everyone else. Copy and paste straight from Claude, you get marked. Use AI the smart way, for brainstorming and remixing and expanding your own drafts, and you're fine. It's a comforting argument. It's also wrong, and it's wrong in a way that matters if you write books. I wrote a first version of this correction the week the announcement landed, and I got half of it right. This is the version with the other half in it. What happened in August On 11 August 2026, Anthropic confirmed it would embed machine-readable marks in content Claude generates or processes. Text carries an imperceptible watermark. Files carry signed provenance metadata using the C2PA standard. Almost nobody covering this mentioned why it happened. Compliance drove it. Article 50 of the EU AI Act obliges providers to mark synthetic content in a machine-readable format, and those transparency obligations took effect on 2 August 2026. Anthropic signed the associated Code of Practice in July, alongside roughly 190 other signatories. Behind Article 50 sit fines of up to 15 million euros or 3 percent of worldwide turnover. That distinction matters, because a company acting on principle can change its mind. A company acting on regulation cannot, and every other major provider carries the same obligation. Models launched on or after 2 August support marking at launch, and as of early September the two Anthropic names in that group are both from its 5.1 generation. Older models sit in a transition period with 2 December 2026 attached to it. That date comes from the AI Omnibus provisional agreement reached in May 2026, which gives generative systems already on the market before 2 August until then to meet the machine-readable marking requirement. It's a grace period with a statute behind it, not a deadline someone picked.

I know you all hear this a lot but this came from some of my current line of research and testing using email chains as source material for some new nonfiction books on writing and the author business in general but the number of times I have seen a half a dozen videos on AI publishing, the anthropic watermarks, and KDP banning accounts I thought this was needed. The watermarks were added due to a new European law, and if the other LLM providers are not already watermarking output they soon will have to for compliance with the law. I have another article on this coming soon. I went looking at my competition for both Bookweaver.pro which is tremendously under used right now and for WordCrafter.pro which already has features and dimensions no one else has hit (yet..it will happen). Only ONE has a "Rights Certificate". According to two of my legal friends this is a nice fiction that really says nothing. We can only copyright that portion of a manuscript that is written by human hands at this time, but how do you prove this? By building in a Provenance layer! This has several parts to it to be of real value and the last piece of it has to be done very carefully but is the most important. ****** Sidebar: Has anyone ever seen a "certified" psychic or tarot reader? Who certifies them and under what authority? I've always wondered this. And some will explain themselves with great authority. As a personal reveal, I collect and read tarot and have for many years and will always be "un-certified" (Also working on my own deck design). In the late 90's I even met a truly serious 9th generation High Priestess of Cthulhu that was in her early 20's. Some of you should be laughing here, for those that aren't: H.P. Lovecraft first wrote of the Elder God in 1926 and his short story "The Rats in the Walls" was my first introduction to true horror and still messes with me. ****** So certifications are important even if some of them are absurd.

What has everyone been working on this week? For me it's been a whirlwind of updates, writing training materials, finishing another book and planning several more in the author series and continuing to figure out how to make videos. I've attached the truly rough cut 1st draft of the next author's book I mentioned in the "Wine & Star Trek" article. And the video below shows a few additional changes i made to tthe WCP main page. I moved a couple things around to make them a bit more intuitive and added.... TABS & TABLES!!!! (and the crowd goes wild).