Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
755 contributions to AI Automation Agency Hub
Clarity Before Promises. Value Before Hype. 🎯
As I build Yoniax Automation & Digital Solutions, one principle I want to follow is simple: Be clear about what you do, what you offer, and what you can realistically deliver. It's easy to talk about AI agents, advanced workflows, and automation. But business owners don't necessarily care about the technology itself. They care about the problems it can solve. That's why I believe in three things: 🔹 Clear offers: Explain the problem you're trying to solve in simple language. 🔹 Honest promises: Never guarantee results you haven't validated. 🔹 Reliable delivery: Set clear expectations, test properly, and take responsibility for the work. I'm still building my portfolio and working towards my first client. I'm sharing this because these are the standards I want to establish from the beginning, not because I've mastered everything already. I'd rather build trust through small, proven steps than make big promises I can't support. For those already running a business, what matters most when deciding whether to trust someone new? #AIAutomation #Entrepreneurship #BusinessGrowth #Yoniax
3 likes • 20h
@Bharti Kaith I really like your point about taking responsibility when something goes wrong. 💯 A workflow working perfectly in a demo is one thing, but testing edge cases and handling failures properly is what makes it reliable. I’m trying to build that mindset into my own n8n projects from the beginning. Small, proven steps are definitely better than promises we can’t support. 🤝
1 like • 18h
@Malik Ahmed Thanks, Malik! I agree that focusing on one specific business problem makes the offer much clearer. I’m learning to define what success should look like before building a solution, so the work can be tested against real business needs rather than just whether the workflow runs successfully. 🤝
🏆 On the Board | Week 4, October
7-Day Leaderboard 🥇 @Bharti Kaith ▲ 1 🥈 @Malik Ahmed ▼ 1 🥉 @Yonas Workayehu (NEW!) 30-Day Leaderboard 🥇 @Bharti Kaith 🥈 @Malik Ahmed 🥉 @Yonas Workayehu (NEW!) —————— 🚀 Accelerator Win of the Week: Zachary Ayvazian Zach just closed his biggest deal yet: $19K upfront plus $1,000 a month ongoing. He didn't pitch for it. The client is a water damage and remodel company doing around $3M this year, still running the same four-person office they had at $1M. Emails forwarding into Hotmail, approvals printed and signed by hand, no visibility on margin per job. Zach's build puts the whole back office on rails: a channel per job, a monthly margin report, an approval loop, and 24/7 lead intake. All four phases signed off, kicked off on site this week. —————— 👉 If you want to compress timeline to a successful agency: [SPEAK TO A CONSULTANT HERE]
🏆 On the Board | Week 4, October
2 likes • 18h
Happy to see my name on both leaderboards! 🙌 I’m focused on learning, building practical workflows, and getting better at connecting automation to real business problems. Zach’s win is a great reminder that understanding the client’s operations and finding the right bottlenecks can be more valuable than simply pitching AI. One step at a time! 🚀
I stopped adding Claude Code skills. These 5 run all my client work (free, yours to keep)
Unpopular opinion: big skill packs make Claude Code worse for client work. Every extra skill is another chance for the wrong one to trigger, and none of them know which client you're working on. So I went the other way and kept only the 5 procedures I actually use every week, and open-sourced them: 1. client-workspace: one folder per client with its own rules, voice and approved claims, so Client A's tone never ends up in Client B's email 2. scope-guard: checks every "can you just quickly..." against the signed scope, quotes the extra, and drafts a polite reply (offers a paid add-on or a swap) 3. quick-quote: prices a project from 6 numbers about the client's workflow instead of your hours, and tells you when you're underquoting 4. offer-builder: turns "I do AI automation" into a fixed-scope offer with a price ladder 5. cold-email-agency: 4-step outreach sequences for small business owners There's also a full worked example (a fictional plumbing company) so you can see a real scope check end to end: 3 asks in one client email, one in scope, two quoted, reply drafted. MIT licensed, no email needed: https://github.com/CalebAnderson-Coder/ai-agency-os-starter If you try it, I'd like to know what breaks or what you'd cut.
3 likes • 3d
I like the idea of keeping the system focused on a few procedures that solve real problems instead of adding skills just because they’re available. The client-workspace and scope-guard skills stand out to me because keeping client requirements separate and preventing scope creep become really important once you start managing multiple projects. I’m building my own client acquisition system around prospect research, personalization, outreach, and proposals, so the offer-builder and cold-email skills are especially relevant to me. I’d be interested to see how the pricing procedure accounts for the actual business value and complexity of the workflow, not just the number of steps involved.
3 likes • 20h
@Brian Anderson That makes sense, especially separating the value-based price from the minimum cost needed to deliver the build. I like the idea of using a confidence discount when the business inputs are uncertain instead of pretending every estimate is accurate. In my client acquisition system, I’m still developing the pricing approach. I want to start by identifying a specific bottleneck, understanding its impact on time, missed leads, or lost opportunities, and validating those numbers with the business owner before proposing a solution. Your idea of offering a paid diagnostic when the value isn’t clear is something I’ll consider, because I’d rather validate the problem first than guess at the ROI.
An affordable AI app build workflow: Will it break?
Hey everyone, I’m a student on a tight budget building a healthcare app using Claude Pro and Floot AI. My main goal is to deliver an app that will never break and can smoothly handle thousands of users without data loss. I don't have a technical background, but I plan to use GitHub for backups and Supabase as an external database to avoid relying on Floot’s sandbox. Is this approach alone enough to guarantee stability at scale, or am I missing any critical pieces? Could anyone give me a step-by-step blueprint to wire these together from day one? If you know an even better, more affordable, or more bulletproof stack for a solo builder, I'm completely open to ideas! Thanks so much! 🙌
4 likes • 20h
I think GitHub + Supabase is a sensible starting point on a tight budget, but neither backups nor an external database can guarantee an app will never break. I’d focus on building in layers: version control in GitHub, database backups and access rules in Supabase, input validation, error logging, and automated tests before adding more users. Since it’s a healthcare app, I’d also prioritize privacy, authentication, and strict access controls from day one. Before aiming for thousands of users, test the most important user flows, simulate failures, and verify that you can actually restore data from a backup. Start small, validate reliability, and scale based on evidence rather than assuming the stack alone will handle everything.
🛠️ Home Services + AI Automation: What Would You Automate First?
I’m exploring automation opportunities in home service businesses like plumbing, HVAC, and electrical services. I’m curious to hear from other builders: What do you think is the biggest time-consuming task these businesses still handle manually? - 📩 Responding to new enquiries and missed calls - 📅 Scheduling jobs and coordinating technicians - 🔄 Following up on estimates and potential customers - 📋 Updating customer records and managing job details - ⭐ Following up after a job for feedback or reviews Or is there another problem you think is even bigger? I’d love to hear what you’ve seen in real businesses and which workflows you think are worth automating first. 👇
2 likes • 20h
@Malik Ahmed I like that approach, especially starting with one costly problem and measuring recovered leads and booked jobs before expanding. It also makes it easier to show a business owner whether the automation is actually delivering value. I’d validate the workflow with real data first, then build on it step by step. 🤝
2 likes • 20h
@Vedant Heda That’s a really practical point! The existing software and API access can determine what’s actually feasible before we even start building. I also like your point about missed-call text-back being a simpler entry point, but I’d still check how their phone system works and how replies get handed off to the team before choosing the solution. 🤝
1-10 of 755
Yonas Workayehu
7
5,989 points to level up
@yonas-workayehu-6369
🤖 AI Automation & Agent Builder

Active 25m ago
Joined Aug 13, 2026
ethiopia
Powered by