Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
13 contributions to AI Automation Agency Hub
Finding clients is harder than building automations. Anyone else? 😅
I've been seriously trying to land my first paying AI automation client for about a month now. A little about me: 9 years in IT, from QA Engineer to Head of QA. Now I'm building AI automations with n8n, APIs, and Claude. Here's what I've tried so far: 🔹 Upwork — Sending 1–2 proposals a day, $40/hr, Freelancer Plus. Had a Rising Talent badge. Still no client. 🔹 Fiverr — Just getting started. Not sure whether offering cheap services to get the first reviews is a smart move. 🔹 LinkedIn — Connecting with business owners, asking about their processes and what they'd like to automate. Some really interesting conversations! 🔹 Networking — Talking to local business owners, getting introductions, meeting people. Lots of "sounds interesting, let's stay in touch." But nothing paid yet. I'm learning a lot, but sometimes it feels like I'm doing everything except the one thing that matters -- getting a client. 😂 So I have a question for those who've already made it past this stage: Where did your FIRST paying client actually come from? Was it Upwork, Fiverr, LinkedIn, networking, referrals, or something completely different? And what made the difference? A better portfolio? Lower prices? A free demo? Just talking to more people? I'd genuinely love to hear your stories, especially if you started from zero without an existing audience or connections. 👍 Give this a like if you're also struggling to find your first clients. At least we'll know we're not alone! 😄 And if you've already figured it out, please share what worked. Your experience might save someone months of trial and error. 🙌
2 likes • 3d
@Sidra Safdar I completely agree! Selling the business outcome rather than the automation itself makes much more sense. I'm experimenting with this approach too. Have you noticed a difference in how potential clients respond?
3 likes • 3d
@Dr. Stephen Buscema That's actually something I've been considering! I've spent a lot of time on platforms, but direct outreach to local businesses might be a better approach. Have you personally had more success with this than with freelance platforms?
Question about n8n & Automation for Community members 👇
For those of you who have built automation workflows beyond the testing stage, what has been your biggest challenge when moving them into production? Is it handling errors, managing API limits, dealing with unexpected data, keeping workflows running reliably, or something else? I’ve been experimenting with AI-powered workflows and integrations, and one thing I’m learning is that making a workflow work once is very different from making it reliable in real-world use. What practices or tools have helped you make your workflows production-ready? I’d love to hear your experiences, lessons learned, and any tips for someone moving from experimenting to building reliable automation systems.
2 likes • 4d
The shift that helped me most came from testing, not from n8n: before I ship, I write down the 5 ways this workflow can produce a wrong result while still showing green. Duplicate trigger, partial data, empty response, timezone mismatch, a human editing the source mid-run. Then I make each one happen on purpose in staging. Workflows rarely break the way you expect - they break the way you never tried.
What are people doing instead?
Your idea already has competition... even if nobody sells the exact app you’re imagining. The competition might be a spreadsheet, an assistant, a group chat, or simply putting up with the problem. Imagine software that organizes subcontractor documents. The current solution might be someone checking an inbox every morning and maintaining a folder. Before designing a dashboard, understand that routine: - How much time does it take? - What gets missed? - Who notices the mistakes? - What happens afterward? - Why hasn’t the team changed it already? “Doing nothing” can be a strong competitor when switching feels harder than the problem. Write down the current workaround for your idea. Include what it does well. People have reasons for using it. Then identify the specific improvement that could justify changing their routine. What would your product replace today?
3 likes • 4d
The “include what it does well” line is the one most builders skip. Workarounds survive because they quietly handle the weird cases - the one client who sends PDFs by WhatsApp, the invoice that needs a manual note. The person running the routine knows all of that and never wrote it down. Replace the routine without those cases and you’ve built something cleaner that works on fewer days. To your question: most of what I build replaces a spreadsheet plus one person’s memory, and the memory part is always the harder half.
Three signs a business is ready for automation (and two that it isn't)
Not every business is ready for automation, and taking on the wrong client costs more than missing a sale. Ready: they already get enquiries but reply slowly, they can name the problem in one sentence, and someone owns the follow-up. Not ready: they have no steady enquiries yet, or they want software to fix a process nobody has defined. A short chat before you build saves weeks of rework. What's your quickest way to tell if a new client is ready?
1 like • 4d
Solid list. My quickest test: I ask them to walk me through what happened with the last enquiry - not how the process should work, but what actually happened last Tuesday. Ready clients can tell you: who saw it, where it sat, why it took two days. Not-ready clients describe an ideal process that nobody actually follows. If the story and the process doc don’t match, you’d be automating the doc, not the business — and that always breaks in week two.
Two Voice-Agent Stacks Shipped the Same Day. Which One Fits Your Build?
Two new voice-agent stacks shipped on the same day. They take opposite approaches, and the difference matters if you're building one. ElevenLabs — Eleven Realtime One speech-to-speech model hears and speaks. → Max starts talking in 0.57 s and scores 98.8% on Big Bench Audio → Mini is the cheaper option for natural chat. It handles interruptions and "mm-hmm" → Already on OpenAI's Realtime API? Change the endpoint and model name Mistral — Voxtral 3 A pipeline: listen → reason → speak, streamed together. → Each turn finishes in under a second → Swap the LLM, voice or language without rewriting the agent → Runs on Mistral's EU-hosted API from $0.04/min, or on your own servers For building AI voice receptionists, here's how to choose: Speech-to-speech when a fast, natural feel is what sells. Pipeline when the client needs control: their own LLM, their own data region, a specific language. Either way, the voice itself is no longer the bottleneck. The tool calls and the script are. Which would you pick for building AI voice receptionist?
Two Voice-Agent Stacks Shipped the Same Day. Which One Fits Your Build?
1 like • 4d
For a receptionist I’d pick the pipeline, and your last line is the reason. The voice will sound fine either way — what decides if the client keeps paying is whether the agent can actually book the slot, check the calendar, and not double-book. That’s all tool calls and integrations, and that’s where I’d want full control rather than a black box. Speech-to-speech is the better demo. Pipeline is the better month three.
1-10 of 13
Kateryna Larina
4
23 points to level up
@kateryna-larina-8245
AI Automation Consultant & Builder | Helping Businesses Reduce Manual Work with Reliable Workflows | n8n, Make, Zapier & API Integrations

Active 2d ago
Joined Oct 25, 2026
Powered by