Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
Simcha Hub of Pet Physiology

42 members • Free

Simcha Healthcare

94 members • Free

GHL Blueprint

1.7k members • Free

HighLevel Huddle w/ Clay

3.1k members • Free

Construction Contractors Hub

4.7k members • Free

GoHighLevel w/ Robb Bailey

13.5k members • Free

Lifestyle Founders Group™

13.6k members • Free

8 contributions to Construction Contractors Hub
Introduction
Hi! Excited to be here. I am the co-owner of a pool construction company in North Texas. We are a small design/build firm, 100% woman owned and operated. I am always looking for more efficient ways to streamline our processes, automate what we can automate, and give Claude more work to do.
1 like • 5d
@Corey Nichols Welcome Corey! Design/build + construction seems like a great environment for finding automation opportunities, especially when you’re already thinking about giving Claude more work. What part of your current process feels the most repetitive right now lead intake, estimating, project management, client communication, or something else?
0 likes • 4d
@Corey Nichols Yeah, I can see why those two would be worth solving. The estimating side sounds like a good place to use Claude, but I’d probably want to understand your current process before trying to automate it. The operations side is interesting too. Once a job is sold, there’s usually a whole chain of things that need to happen client onboarding, internal notifications, tasks, scheduling, follow-ups, documentation, etc. How are you currently handling that handoff from “job sold” to “project in progress”? Is it mostly manual right now?
What is your scheduling framework/approach?
Here's mine: A construction programme is your methodology expressed through time. The Gantt chart is only the output. The actual work is deciding how the team will deliver the project: - Break the scope into activities with clear owners. - Sequence the work from the required milestones. - Calculate durations using quantities and realistic production rates. - Identify the critical path and low-float activities. - Optimise the work that can actually change the completion date. Crashing critical-path work usually costs more. Fast-tracking it introduces more risk. Doing either to non-critical work will not bring the completion date forward. Do I think a planner should build the programme alone and hand it to the site team? No. The people delivering the project need to help build the methodology and commit to it. This is my attempt to explain it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QahPnqB4UHo
0 likes • 8d
@Tim Fairley I like the distinction between the programme and the Gantt chart. The part about having the people delivering the work involved in building the methodology is especially important since the best schedule on paper can still fail if the site team doesn’t buy into it. Out of curiosity, where do you see the biggest friction after the programme is built keeping it updated, collecting progress from the site team, or managing changes when the project starts deviating from the plan?
1 like • 7d
@Tim Fairley Exactly. When the people delivering the job are involved in creating the schedule, they’re much more likely to actually own it rather than just receive it. I imagine that makes the schedule much more useful once the project is underway too.
93 clients in first 2 months
93 clients in 2 months. Now our estimating system is the bottleneck. 🚧🤖 We launched a construction estimating business in the Czech Republic roughly 2 months ago. So far: → 93 paying clients → Almost entirely construction companies → And we’re still just getting started. We basically act as an outsourced estimating department for contractors. A client sends us drawings, BoQs, specifications, PDFs, Excel files, photos, etc. We then: 1. Analyze the entire project 2. Determine exactly what needs to be priced 3. Extract quantities, materials and technical requirements 4. Find missing information / conflicts between documents 5. Build the bill of quantities / estimate 6. Price it using Czech construction cost databases + real market pricing 7. Finalize it in professional estimating software 8. QA the estimate and send it back to the contractor 9. We already use Claude, AI agents and our own custom-built internal app to help with this. And it works. But now we’ve reached the point where sales isn't our biggest bottleneck anymore — the estimating system is. We want to take what we have and build a MUCH better AI-assisted estimating workflow. Not a ChatGPT wrapper. Something that can reliably help us process real construction projects every single day — understand hundreds of pages of documentation, extract information, catch conflicts, prepare quantities, assist with pricing and eventually automate a large part of the estimating workflow while keeping human verification where it matters. I’m looking for someone in this community who REALLY understands one or more of these: - AI + construction estimating - Claude / LLM agent workflows - document & drawing analysis - quantity takeoff automation - estimating software - building reliable AI systems for real-world workflows Ideally, I’d love to find someone who could first look at what we've already built, tear it apart, tell us what we're doing wrong, and then potentially help us build the next version.
0 likes • 8d
@Filip Douša This is a really interesting use case, especially because you already have real projects going through the system. I’d probably start by mapping the current workflow end-to-end and identifying where the biggest bottleneck or failure points are before trying to add more AI. With hundreds of pages of drawings, PDFs and specifications involved, I imagine the biggest challenge isn’t just extracting information but making sure the extracted data stays reliable enough for human verification and estimating. I’d be curious to know where the current system breaks down most often document extraction, quantity takeoffs, pricing, or keeping all the information connected between the different stages?
5-minute Google Maps check that tells you if competitors are stealing your jobs (most contractors never look)
Before you run another ad or ask for another referral — do this free check on your own Google listing. Takes 5 minutes. Most contractors who run it are surprised by what they find. Check 1 — Your last review date When was your last Google review posted? If it's been 6+ weeks, your Maps ranking is already dropping. New customers searching your area are seeing competitors first — even if your work is better. Check 2 — The competitor gap Search "[your service] + [your city]" right now. Look at the top 3 results. How many reviews do they have vs you? Every 10-review gap = roughly 1–2 lost jobs per month just from ranking. That's before anyone even looks at your price. Check 3 — Your unresponded reviews Any 1-star or 2-star reviews sitting unanswered? Research shows 88% of customers read business responses before making a decision. An unanswered bad review isn't just one lost job — it's every person who reads it and picks someone else. The math nobody talks about: 5 missed or lost jobs/month × $400 avg job = $2,000/month That's $24,000/year lost — not from bad work, but from a Maps listing that's slowly falling behind. The contractors winning right now aren't just better at the job. They've figured out what happens after the job — the review, the follow-up, the rebooking. What does your Maps listing look like right now? Drop your star rating and when your last review came in — curious what others are working with.
0 likes • 8d
@Liton Sarker The “what happens after the job” point is probably the biggest takeaway here. A lot of contractors seem focused on generating the next lead without looking at what happens to the customer they just finished serving. Have you found that most contractors are already doing some kind of automated review/follow-up, or is this still largely being handled manually?
Introduction
Hi everyone, great to be here! I'm Craig and I've been a Contracts Director for a supply and installation company for the past 10 years. I’m joining this community because I really want to connect with like-minded construction professionals and draw on your real-world experiences to help improve my current processes. My number one goal right now is streamlining. I'm specifically looking for new, highly efficient ways of tracking projects from start to finish. Currently, my main tech stack consists of G Suite and Salesforce, but I’m incredibly interested in exploring how to integrate AI into my workflows to save time and reduce friction. If anyone has successfully brought AI into their project management, or has any favorite integrations/workflows that play nice with Salesforce and G Suite, I would absolutely love to hear about them! Looking forward to learning from you all and sharing what I know along the way. What is everyone else using to track their projects right now?
0 likes • 8d
@Craig Thomson That’s a really interesting use case, especially since you already have Salesforce and G Suite in place. I’d probably start by looking at where the most manual friction happens between project updates, documentation, and keeping Salesforce current rather than trying to add AI everywhere at once. For a construction business, I’d imagine things like automatically capturing project updates, organizing information, triggering follow-ups, or keeping the right people notified could remove a lot of repetitive work. What part of your current project-tracking process takes the most manual time right now?
1-8 of 8
Victor Adeleye
2
14 points to level up
@victor-adeleye-2283
I help agencies, coaches & local businesses turn more leads into customers with AI, CRM, funnels & automation.

Active 3d ago
Joined Aug 10, 2026
Powered by